Kw-logo-smaller

Comments

American Indians - Plains Tribes & Southeastern Tribes

Do you know what stinky, human body parts some First Nation tribes used to wear? How about which raw organs of a freshly killed buffalo they considered a treat? Keep reading to find out. Back to Article

Please login or register to add comments

Princewifey 123
Princewifey 123 wrote:
2012-03-23 19:02:32 -0700

im from the {cherokee tribe}

report
Prettyboi_Paris_1922748
Prettyboi_Paris_1922748 wrote:
2012-03-23 18:57:59 -0700

im Cherokee

report
ObeyMySwaqq♥
ObeyMySwaqq♥ wrote:
2012-03-23 18:56:46 -0700

Im Somewhat Native American [Cherokee) . (:

report
Jayfeather1999
Jayfeather1999 wrote:
2012-01-16 11:32:18 -0800

wish i had this in 2nd grade...

report
mybabe brian
mybabe brian wrote:
2011-10-16 08:17:06 -0700

THIS IS SOOOOO GOING TO HELP ME ALLOT LOL

report
EpicCrazyGirl
EpicCrazyGirl wrote:
2010-11-07 09:20:12 -0800

This helped me and one other article did on the Woodland First Nations helped me SO much! I wasn't there on the day before the weekend and we had a SS test on Monday. I forgot to take my notes home, so I had to use the internet. XD This helped me so much,

report
cutepoohbear12
cutepoohbear12 wrote:
2010-11-06 03:55:10 -0700

wow nice article

report
back to story
F1163794554796

How Many Native Americans in the US?

  • One million.
  • Six million.
  • 12 million.
  • 30 million.

related stories

Micro_micro_dreamer
Usually when we dream we don’t have any control over what pops into our heads, but dream catchers...
Micro_southwest-micro
The Native peoples of the Pacific Northwest spanned from Alaska to Washington state. Find out all...
Micro_northwest-micro
The Native peoples of the Pacific Northwest spanned from Alaska to Washington state. Find out all...

Random in the forums

Teh_Skittlez
Teh_Skittlez posted in Debating:
"AlphaT" wrote: "Teh_Skittlez" wrote: "AlphaT" wrote: "Teh_Skittlez" wrote: "Vampire Poison" wrote: I'm not exactly sure about this one, I do feel like we should have the death penalty, and then again, I think it's cruel. I believe that it depends on the kind of person and what their crime is. I would feel a lot safer if a person who was a serial killer wasn't around anymore. Again, the Anders Breivik case is a great example of a country treating a mass murderer like a human being rather than a monster (after all, we are a little bit old to be believing in monsters).  So...after reading up on him, I'm very surprised.  He was the Taliban's Taliban.  But he's twisted. He should not of been deemed sane. He should be spending the rest of his days in Solitary Confinement.  Would locking this man in a small space and letting his mind corrode even further really service anyone? Would you or I actually be better off? Do you think the victims' families will be safer at night knowing we've crushed the psyche of a murderer?  Being in prison is good enough, and he'll stay in prison as long as he's a threat, I see no reason that we need to torture him (and that is exactly what indefinite solitary confinement is), other than to satisfy our primal desires. This is why I consider this such a progressive decision. Treating even mass murderers like human beings who still have potential value is progress.  Crushing his psyche is more humane then killing the man. And at this point, he's not going to be much good to society.  Not every psychopathic murderer can come back to be a good citizen. Should he get a shrink? Of course. But if he's deemed "broken beyond repair" I don't see why we should let him be among others, so that he can either be martyr'd for his beliefs in jail or kill a Muslim who is in the prison, or spread his message to to others.  The compromise is that we need to have a volley of psychological tests to determine if they could be fixed (And yes, i know it's not that simple...but its better then letting EVERY SINGLE PSYCHOPATH in a regular prison) and use those tests to place them either in a regular prison, or have a makeshift Arkham Asylum, or solitary confinement.  I think you're confusing high-security and solitary confinement. There is absolutely no reason to keep anybody in solitary confinement indefinitely. We do not need to kill him, or crush his psyche, we have other options. IF he is still deemed unsafe, they can deal with him as they see fit. Obviously if he presents an active danger to other inmates, he should be kept away, but I seriously question the idea that we should preemptively punish him for things he hasn't actually done yet. I don't disagree that it's a case-by-case basis, obviously not every murderer can be reintegrated into society, but if there's even one, don't you think we should give him that opportunity? I think we should start by assuming that every one can be rehabilitated (which obviously won't happen), and then narrow it down from there, not the other way around. Prison is not about making people uncomfortable, it should be about keeping society safe, and about reintegrating violent criminals into a safe society. 
reply 21 minutes
Fenmore
Fenmore posted in Say Anything:
potato
reply 22 minutes
WizardMorgan
COOKIES  :)
reply 30 minutes
AlphaT
AlphaT posted in Say Anything:
Store bought posters, be swaggin in dat room yo.
reply 36 minutes
Macbarbie09
Macbarbie09 posted in General:
Welcome to my August faves! Here are some of my Fave things in August: Song: Dancing Queen- ABBA!! That song is so Awesome!! Rude- Magic!!!  Why you gotta be so rude? Don't you know im Human too? Food: Ice Cream! Game: Pokemon X!! Show: How i met your mother what are some of your faves from August??
reply 43 minutes