-
x

Meet New Friends!

Recommended friends are based on your interests. Make sure they are up to date.

Friends ff8c072dd79a91c1300f032d674241a8d64367100ffb1f25fa3f9bec4a05319f
Kidzworld Logo

Being Nikki Book Review

In the sequel to Airhead, bestselling author Meg Cabot shows readers why being an A-List celebrity isn’t necessarily as glamorous as it seems.


Airhead

Three months ago, Em underwent brain transplant surgery after being crushed by a Stark Enterprises television. Fortunately, that same day, A-List supermodel (and the face of Stark Enterprises) suffered an aneurism that left her brain dead. Stark performed the transplant by putting Em’s brain into Nikki’s body. But surviving the accident came at a price.


Brain Surgery

Now Em must pretend to be Nikki Howard, using amnesia as her excuse for her personality shift and memory loss. But Em can’t tell anyone about her true identity or Stark will send her parents to prison. Not even her best friend, and secret crush, Christopher, who believes Em is dead.


Evil Mastermind

Em tries to make Christopher fall in love with Nikki. But something inside him died the day Em had her accident. And it turned him into an evil mastermind, partnering with his computer-genius cousin to hack into Stark Enterprises files and destroy their corrupt company.


Eyes Everywhere

To make matters worse, Em suspects that Stark has eyes and ears on her 24/7. They seem to know about everything she does, which could only mean that they’ve bugged her gadgets and her apartment. To top it off, Nikki Howard’s brother Steven showed up claiming that his mother is missing. In order to maintain the façade, Nikki must use her resources to help find her. But what if Stark Enterprises is behind her disappearance?


The Bottom Line

Meg Cabot really digs deep into the characters she created in Airhead. We see people for who they really are, and whether you like them or not, that’s up to you. Being Nikki is a intense chick-lit mystery that any Meg Cabot fan will love.


Related Stories:
8 Comments

Related Stories

Micro thesight micro
In Judy Blundell's two book collection, The Sight: Premonitions and Disappearance, Gracie investi...
Micro scarlettfever micro
Scarlett Martin's life is hectic in Scarlett Fever by Maureen Johnson, the sequel to Suite Scarle...
Micro num8ers article
What would you do if, just by looking into someone’s eyes, you could see the date they will die? ...
F1114803603312

Who Do You Think Kate Should Date?

  • Andy Roddick.
  • She belongs with Orlando.
  • I think she should go out with me!
  • Chad Michael Murray.

General In The Forums

Skipper_
Skipper_ posted in New Users:
henlo! welcome to KW!  the people on here is nice so i hope you like it! nice to meet you.
reply about 1 hour
Skipper_
Skipper_ posted in New Users:
Hello and welcome to KW! I hope you like the people here, because they're friendly tbh but anyways, nice to meet you~
reply about 1 hour
Skipper_
Skipper_ posted in Debating:
There's a lot of evidence, my friend. First evidence is that Trump is not allowing trans to join the army. The Muslim ban? He's such a racist and such a discriminator...do you want me to give you more evidence?
reply about 1 hour
Tennis123
Tennis123 posted in Debating:
And btw, it’s acceptable for a person to defend himself from the polar bear or whatever animal
reply about 2 hours
Tennis123
Tennis123 posted in Debating:
"Kirsteeeeen" wrote: "Tennis123" wrote: i have changed my views on things like this, i think 99% of people that hunt and the people that complain about the hunting are complete hypocrites though.  if you think that its justified to kill an animal in a given context, you must have a difference between a human and the animal that if true of the human would justify killing the animal, otherwise you say X justifies killing something but doesnt justify killing something ate the same time, which of course is a contradiction. hopefully people can understand that.  What gives, polar bears for example, the right to kill humans for food but doesn't give humans the right to kill an animal for food? Polar bears have no moral agency and they must kill for food. If we went over to a place in the North Pole and a mentally disabled person with the inability to understand right and wrong and they had to kill for food, I wouldnt add any moral weight to the act they commit bc how can you morally judge an act one commits without them having any conception of morals? Some mentally disabled people have no moral agency and can’t really understand anything. Would you judge them morally? 
reply about 2 hours