Kw-logo-smaller

Science Project: The Strength of Sand

How strong could a bunch of a teeny-tiny particles be? They’re so small how could there any strength to them. Well, this science project will redefine the old phrase, strength in numbers. Test how strong sand can be and fool your friends and maybe even teachers!

Materials:

  • Cardboard tube from a roll of paper towel
  • Sand can be found at craft or garden stores if not close to beach or desert
  • Sheet of tissue paper
  • Rubber bands
  • Scissors
  • Stick - dowel rod approximately 1 foot in length or a drumstick works well

Procedure:

  1. Cut the tissue into 2 squares with 8 inch sides.
  2. Place the tissue square over one end of the cardboard tube and secure it there with a rubber band twisted around the tissue and tube.
  3. Get a friend to take the stick and see if they can puncture a hole in the tissue paper that’s covering the end of the tube. Should be pretty easy to do so.
  4. Replace the square of tissue paper with a new intact one and secure it the same way you did the last, but this time fill the tube ¾’s of the way up with sand.
  5. Now have your friend again try and puncture a hole in the tissue paper. What’s your hypothesis of what will happen? Are they going to get sand all over the floor or will the force of sand stymie them?

So Much Sand! How Much Sand Is There in the World?Courtesy of projects.math.arizona.edu

What should happen is that the sand in the tube will prevent the stick from piercing the tissue paper. When the stick pushes against the sand, the sand particles respond by pushing against the walls of the cardboard tube much like a plug in the drain of a tub. So even that little amount of sand makes the tissue paper a nearly impenetrable surface.

Gives you a whole new perspective on sand castles, huh? Maybe they are secure fortresses after all!

Have your say!

What do you think would happen if the sand was wet sand? Think about how a sand castle feels and holds it’s shape. How would wet sand change this experiment? Would the sand be stronger or weaker? Share your hypothesis in the comment’s section below!

 

>
>

readers voted!

Comments

brunostar

brunostar wrote:

O_o
commented: Mon Oct 21, 2013

papa3232

papa3232 wrote:

wow
commented: Mon May 27, 2013

topsailturtle99
Iwould like to go to school every day
commented: Mon May 27, 2013

there are 19 more comments

Please login or register to add comments


like this article?
Sign up now to get more just like!

latest videos

Poll_sand

How do you feel about sand at the beach?

  • I love the warm sand at the beach! I could lay in it all day.
  • I hate sand so much! I don't like going to the beach and getting sand in everything! Ick!
  • My favorite thing to do at the beach is build sand castles so I guess I like sand.
  • I don't mind the sand, unless it ends up in my mouth- ugg that's so gross!

related stories

Micro_micro_quicksand
Have you ever seen a movie where the hero is dashing through the jungle when they step in a bog o...
Micro_micro_balloon
Never thought you could do rocket science? Well, think again. This project uses the basic princip...
Micro_micro_seedbomb
Have you ever seen an empty lot in your neighborhood and wished that it could be nicer looking? I...
Micro_rock-candy-micro
Did you know crystals aren't just for decoration? If you need some science fair project inspirati...

Random in the forums

AlphaT
AlphaT posted in Debating:
"Teh_Skittlez" wrote: "AlphaT" wrote: "Teh_Skittlez" wrote: I should have known using the confederacy as an example would resonate with you. Like you said, it's another topic, but I could also talk about the Pacific slave trade.  I'm not pro slave, but I am against the south=racist bandwagon. I know you're smart enough to not be on that wagon though. Objection: Relevance? How is Pacific Slave Trade significant to the topic? It affected men and women alike (albeit mostly men)? It's not particularly relevant, it's another topic, that's why I'm not going to talk about it.  Oh. Okay.
reply 6 minutes
Teh_Skittlez
Teh_Skittlez posted in Debating:
"AlphaT" wrote: "Teh_Skittlez" wrote: I should have known using the confederacy as an example would resonate with you. Like you said, it's another topic, but I could also talk about the Pacific slave trade.  I'm not pro slave, but I am against the south=racist bandwagon. I know you're smart enough to not be on that wagon though. Objection: Relevance? How is Pacific Slave Trade significant to the topic? It affected men and women alike (albeit mostly men)? It's not particularly relevant, it's another topic, that's why I'm not going to talk about it. 
reply 7 minutes
AlphaT
AlphaT posted in Debating:
"Teh_Skittlez" wrote:I should have known using the confederacy as an example would resonate with you. Like you said, it's another topic, but I could also talk about the Pacific slave trade.  I'm not pro slave, but I am against the south=racist bandwagon. I know you're smart enough to not be on that wagon though. Objection: Relevance? How is Pacific Slave Trade significant to the topic?
reply 12 minutes
Teh_Skittlez
Teh_Skittlez posted in Debating:
"AlphaT" wrote: "Teh_Skittlez" wrote: "AlphaT" wrote: "Teh_Skittlez" wrote: "AlphaT" wrote: "Teh_Skittlez" wrote: Right, I'm obligated to sign up for the draft, and you couldn't even if you wanted to. Then again, women couldn't own and manage land while married until 1718....and it wasn't national until around 1850. You should probably specify where, because the place where I live wasn't even colonized yet in 1718.  Providence of Pennsylvania. However most states didn't accept it until around 1840-50. Maryland had achieved statehood in 1788, but it took them until 1841 to legalize married women to own property, and even them they had no control over the property. This is the case for many states. Face it, early America treated women as property....she was right on that part. But that's all changed. I'm not denying it. I was merely suggesting that you should specify where. Of course, in all the dates you've listed so far, men were also to be bought and sold as property in the U.S. in the states that would become the Confederacy. I would say that their treatment as property was much harsher than that of women in many cases, but yes, of course both men and women have been treated as property by the law in the past, and still are in many places today.    American Slavery didn't discriminate between genders. And for women, it was the same for blacks and whites. Also, pinning slavery and the confederacy together? I thought you knew more about the topic. But that's another debate. I should have known using the confederacy as an example would resonate with you. Like you said, it's another topic, but I could also talk about the Pacific slave trade. 
reply 17 minutes
Ghostling
Ghostling posted in Food:
Vegetables=Potatoes. Potatoes=Chips (crisps). Chips=Good.
reply about 2 hours

play online games

Candy-100

A great online version of the famous Candy Crush. This is the best game launched...

1515_gl_kidzworld_100x100_jpg_fz

Intriguing planets, weird and wonderful characters; challenge friends and find a...

157262_(2)

When you go back to Candyland, you’ll wonder why you ever left in the first plac...

100x100_ra_logo_girl

Uncle George has left you his farm, but unfortunately it’s in pretty bad shape. ...

_thumb_100x100

Shoot blobs with different properies to merge yellow blobs. Your blobs can be re...