Kw-logo-smaller

Top 5 Authors Under 30

Feb 19, 2013

These five young authors prove you don’t have to be old to write a good book! Check out Kidzworld’s list of Top 5 Authors Under 30.

No. 5: Cayla Kluver

Cayla KluverCayla Kluver

Cayla’s debut novel Legacy was published by Harlequin Teen in 2011. Since then she has released two follow-up books.

No. 4: Paige Harbison

Paige HarbisonPaige Harbison

The daughter of another famous writer (Beth Harbison), Paige has already released two books ( Here Lies Bridget and New Girl) and has a third planned for 2013.

No. 3: Kristin Cast

Kristin CastKristin Cast

Kristin is the daughter of author P.C. Cast. Together with her mother she is the co-author of the House of Night series, which includes 11 books.

No. 2: Veronica Roth

Veronica RothVeronica Roth

Veronica is the author of the Divergent trilogy, for which she won the Goodreads 2011 Choice Award. Her first book is being made into a movie, set to be released in 2014.

No. 1: Samantha van Leer

Samantha van LeerSamantha van Leer

Samantha is the daughter of literary giant Jodi Picoult. The mother-daughter duo released Between the Lines, a book the two of them wrote together, in June 2012.

Have Your Say

What young authors do you like to read? Let us know!

 

25 Comments

latest videos

Poll-booklover

As a book lover, what would be your ideal gift?

  • A signed, first edition copy of my favorite novel.
  • Can't have enough bookends!
  • A gift card to my favorite book store!
  • Book accessories! (ex. Book jewelry, book purse, bookmark, book iPhone case, etc).

related stories

Micro_topteenbooksfor2012-micro
There's nothing better than curling up by the fire with a good book. If you're looking for recomm...
Micro_micro_writing
It's time to put your head down and complete a very large goal: write a whole novel. To help cele...
Micro_harry potter-micro
Before lots of your favorite movies hit the big screen, they were best-selling books. Check out t...
Micro_teen_read_week-micro
On October 17, YALSA is celebrating Teen Read Week 2012 with a Tweet-a-thon. Find out how you can...

Random in the forums

PerksBeingABookworm
In my opinion, cursing in general is pretty tasteless. It's not exactly a behavior to admire.  However, in regards to the question, I don't think people who are 13 and under should be cursing. Not to sound condescending to those who are younger than me, but my reasoning is, many people who are in that particular age group don't fully comprehend the weight expletives carry.  Here is an example: A mother is out running errands in heavy traffic. Her 6 year old son is seated in the back of the car.  As she's about to make a turn, another vehicle cuts her off. Irritated, she curses the offender under her breath, unaware that her son has heard her. Later, while in a check-out line at a supermarket, her son, growing restless, stomps his foot and yells the same curse. The six year old didn't understand what he was saying, he was repeating what he'd heard from his mother. He didn't understand that the word was inappropriate and potentially offensive.  The average 13 year old (or even a 10 year old, for that matter), however, would understand that it was inappropriate and that it was offensive.   
reply 3 minutes
frooty-lips
frooty-lips posted in Debating:
"anna9grace7" wrote:. flirting with other girls. changing attiutudes. their parents.privacy.their intrestboys can be a pain in the butt, so letes discuuss what makes u mad bout boys. below! Same here girl:) LOL
reply 19 minutes
tweenblogger
tweenblogger posted in Debating:
Cursing in not very classy. Why do poeple curse? Honestly, whats the point?
reply 22 minutes
angel513
angel513 posted in Debating:
Lol:):):)
reply about 1 hour
tweenblogger
tweenblogger posted in Debating:
"american_brit" wrote:   "catsrcute9" wrote: Sure, some people think they are in love when really it is lust but there are plenty of people, gay and straight, that love each other. I believe that it would be beneficial if we kinda cut down on the baby making. The more people on earth, that means that more resources are being used. In a way gays are doing you a favor. Odds are, early on, gays were most likely killed for being different. So it wasn't like they had to chance to evolve .   If gays/lesbians we made to have babies then gays would not even exist. Just because a century old book says that gays cant be married doesn't mean people are going to listen to it. Modify you bible to the now times. Rules change, so should your's. Interesting... And how do you suggest we do that? Prevent people from having children? Slowly dispatch of the current population? I'm sorry. Life is the most precious  gift. I don't believe we have the right take that away from another. *cough cough* Back to the main topic at hand... I agree that "there are plenty of people, gay and straight, that love each other." You're not wrong in that assumption. However, there are all kinds of love -though at the root core it comes with willing the good others. (We should "love one another as He has loved us.") But the attraction and desire to be with another as as man and wife can be one? That's called lust. As a Christian, I believe that such physicality should be reserved for marriage with the intention of bringing new life into the world.  Like any group seen as different, homosexuals have been persecuted (ex: WWII) -as they still are. But let's take a looksie back in the past, shall we? In some cultures such as the Roman? Homosexual relationships were actually encouraged. Specifically, male relationships -many, not all, between those of striking age differences. Now do you believe these were sought out for pleasure or out of love? Haha, actually? The Book's been around for well over a century now... Perhaps, maybe there just might be a sufficient reason as to why. Now, to change the rules? Sorry,  no can do. They aren't mine to alter,  though they're certainly mine to follow (;     Amen to that! 
reply about 1 hour

play online games