Kw-logo-smaller

Should We Be Fighting This War? Feedback

Should We Be Fighting This War? Feedback - Reviewed by Kidzworld on Dec 27, 2006
( Rating: 1 Star Rating)

As the war against Iraq is underway, we're asking what you think about the most recent conflict in the middle east. Should we be fighting a war? Are the United States, Britain, Spain and Portugal just in their crusade against Saddam Hussein? You decide! -

On March 17th, George W. Bush gave Saddam Hussein 48 hours to leave Iraq, or face invasion. Since then, the United States has begun its attack. Tell us what you think about the war waging in Iraq!

1 I think we should have a war. Everybody thinks everything will get resolved if we just try and work it out nicely and blah blah blah. That's never gonna happen! We should show our strength. We don't have to attack innocent people, we can just attack the biological or nuclear plants. We have proof (September 11,) that the Al Qaeda members mean business. If we don't step up to the plate and fight, they'll think we are weak and will attack us more. We owe it to the REAL heroes (all those who died in the September 11th attacks,) to fight. What about all the children that lost their parents and friends on September 11th? We owe it to them! Unless, for some odd reason, Osama, Saddam, and all the other Al Qaeda members back down, I say YES to war.

Kidz Submit by:

Nickname: faeriequeen_91
Age: 13

1 I think we should not go to war because it could effect family lives and effect going to work and business. If Saddam doesn't step down, there is no telling what could happen.

Kidz Submit by:

Nickname: lachrisha6
Age: 11

1 What is faeriequeen_91 talking about? Are you stupid? You think if they only want to attack the nuclear and biological plants that they need the armed forces of 30 of the world's strongest countries? Pretty stupid, huh? And what is the "proof" that the Al Qaeda members mean business? You only know what you see on CNN. And that's crap. Bin Laden is nothing - how do you expect him to devise such a brilliant plan to attack the WTC. And outsmart the CIA? Pretty weird, considering that he was actually TRAINED BY AMERICANS! It was just an excuse to attack Afghanistan. Now they control the country and have instant access to the Chinese, Pakistani and Indian borders. The same is going on with Iraq. You think Saddam Hussein is really their target? Then how come the first thing they did was take control of the oil? You think that to get ONE MAN, they need 225,000 land troops, in addition to weapons and planes worth 95 billion dollars? I don't think so. And who are those "heroes?" They may be, but how many were there? 2,000? 3,000? What about the 8,000 Muslims killed in the Bosnian war? The millions killed as a result of the Gulf War? The millions of Iraqis dying of cancer and other diseases because of the first Bush's weapons? The thousands being killed in Palestine? Aren't those heroes? Sorry faeriequeen_91, but unless you get your facts straight your gonna sound pretty ignorant.

Kidz Submit by:

Nickname: confused1988
Age: 15

  • For faeriequeen_91's response to confused1988 and more Kidzworld member feedback, click here!

    Related Stories:

  • The Republic of Iraq
  • The History of Afghanistan
  • Veteran's Day
  • More About Events and Peeps Around the World...
  • 0 Comments

    latest videos

    F1121470501156

    Do You Agree With The US-led Invasion of Iraq?

    • Yes.
    • No.

    related stories

    Random in the forums

    TheEnd777
    TheEnd777 posted in Debating:
    "-Karpov-" wrote: "TheEnd777" wrote: The law is NOT about discrimination Being able to discriminate against a certain class of people is exactly what it's about.  "TheEnd777" wrote: Why should a caterer or a florist be forced to serve for a wedding that they believe is wrong and immoral according to their religion? Because they're a  part of an economy where discrimination is not conducive to healthy business or ethical behavior.  So what you are saying is that the rights of the gay people trump the rights of the religious people? In a free enterprise capitalist system, by definition the people have the right to run a business however they see fit. You should be allowed to provide your services to whoever you want, not be forced into providing them to whoever wants them, otherwise it is not freedom, it is dictation.  
    reply 2 minutes
    Ghostling
    Ghostling posted in General:
    I don't remember.
    reply 2 minutes
    deadguy
    deadguy posted in General:
    fjljfdknjklv;,dropkg    <--- that's art.
    reply 5 minutes
    -Karpov-
    -Karpov- posted in Debating:
    "TheEnd777" wrote:The law is NOT about discrimination Being able to discriminate against a certain class of people is exactly what it's about.  "TheEnd777" wrote:Why should a caterer or a florist be forced to serve for a wedding that they believe is wrong and immoral according to their religion? Because they're a  part of an economy where discrimination is not conducive to healthy business or ethical behavior. 
    reply 6 minutes
    TheEnd777
    TheEnd777 posted in Debating:
    "lelnah" wrote:America is SUPPOSEDLY the country of freedom. Of course this is wrong! VERY wrong! So it's okay to force a florist or a caterer to provide for a wedding that violates their religion? Or to force a store to employ someone even if their personal values go against them? 
    reply 10 minutes

    play online games