-
x

Meet New Friends!

Recommended friends are based on your interests. Make sure they are up to date.

Friends
Kw-logo-smaller

Should We Be Fighting A War In Iraq

Should We Be Fighting A War In Iraq - Reviewed by Kidzworld on Dec 27, 2006
( Rating: 1 Star Rating)

war iraq george w bush junoir junior speech address ultimatum march 17 saddam suddam hussein hussien hussain husein hussan husayn irac irack irak united states US america americans troops britain UK nations UN sanctions death children iraqi feedback o

On March 17th, George W. Bush gave Saddam Hussein 48 hours to leave Iraq, or face invasion. Since then, the United States has begun its attack. Tell us what you think about the war waging in Iraq!

1 I think we should have a war. Everybody thinks everything will get resolved if we just try and work it out nicely and blah blah blah. That's never gonna happen! We should show our strength. We don't have to attack innocent people, we can just attack the biological or nuclear plants. We have proof (September 11,) that the Al Qaeda members mean business. If we don't step up to the plate and fight, they'll think we are weak and will attack us more. We owe it to the REAL heroes (all those who died in the September 11th attacks,) to fight. What about all the children that lost their parents and friends on September 11th? We owe it to them! Unless, for some odd reason, Osama, Saddam, and all the other Al Qaeda members back down, I say YES to war.

Kidz Submit by:

Nickname: faeriequeen_91
Age: 13

1 I think we should not go to war because it could effect family lives and effect going to work and business. If Saddam doesn't step down, there is no telling what could happen.

Kidz Submit by:

Nickname: lachrisha6
Age: 11

1 What is faeriequeen_91 talking about? Are you stupid? You think if they only want to attack the nuclear and biological plants that they need the armed forces of 30 of the world's strongest countries? Pretty stupid, huh? And what is the "proof" that the Al Qaeda members mean business? You only know what you see on CNN. And that's crap. Bin Laden is nothing - how do you expect him to devise such a brilliant plan to attack the WTC. And outsmart the CIA? Pretty weird, considering that he was actually TRAINED BY AMERICANS! It was just an excuse to attack Afghanistan. Now they control the country and have instant access to the Chinese, Pakistani and Indian borders. The same is going on with Iraq. You think Saddam Hussein is really their target? Then how come the first thing they did was take control of the oil? You think that to get ONE MAN, they need 225,000 land troops, in addition to weapons and planes worth 95 billion dollars? I don't think so. And who are those "heroes?" They may be, but how many were there? 2,000? 3,000? What about the 8,000 Muslims killed in the Bosnian war? The millions killed as a result of the Gulf War? The millions of Iraqis dying of cancer and other diseases because of the first Bush's weapons? The thousands being killed in Palestine? Aren't those heroes? Sorry faeriequeen_91, but unless you get your facts straight your gonna sound pretty ignorant.

Kidz Submit by:

Nickname: confused1988
Age: 15

  • For faeriequeen_91's response to confused1988 and more Kidzworld member feedback, click here!

    Related Stories:

  • The Republic of Iraq
  • The History of Afghanistan
  • Veteran's Day
  • More About Events and Peeps Around the World...
  • 3 Comments

    Related Stories

    We all know that Arnold Schwarzenegger is the governator... er, governor of California but what is the capital of that state?
    • Los Angeles.
    • San Diego.
    • Sacramento.
    • San Francisco.

    Random In The Forums

    KingShawn13
    KingShawn13 posted in Debating:
    I think it should be lowered to eighteen. It's only fair because if you're able to join the military and risk your life at the age of eighteen then you should be able to drink a #### here and there. Unless they push the recruitment age up to twenty-one then I'll agree that is what the drinking age should be. 
    reply 15 minutes
    Honour
    Honour posted in Debating:
    I think the drinking age should be 70!  There are way too many hooligans running around these days!
    reply 35 minutes
    Jaxon2ooo
    Jaxon2ooo posted in Electronics:
    search "do a barrel roll" in google
    reply about 2 hours
    CaptJolee
    CaptJolee posted in Debating:
    heck no!, people are more stupid when they are young so it's best not to let them drink when they are young
    reply about 2 hours
    BerNerNerZ
    BerNerNerZ posted in Debating:
    For those of you who didn't know the drinking is actually twenty-one . In my opinion the drinking age should not be lowered .  For one , if even young adults do rash things while drinking like doing what I call 'getting jiggy' . Let's not talk about it . Now it might not be their choice to do those things because people get very loopy and unpredictable after drinking .    In my opion drinking shouldn't even be allowed ! It's not like it would help banning it though . Some things are illegal for a reason yet some people feel the need to break the law .  I'm sorry about my ranting . XD What do you think  ? Should the drinking age be lowered ? Or no ?  :)
    reply about 3 hours