Kw-logo-smaller

Comments

The Titanic History

The Titanic sank during her first and final voyage across the Atlantic Ocean when she struck an iceberg off the coast of Newfoundland in 1912. Back to Article

Please login or register to add comments

Stuck.In.The.Moment
Stuck.In.The.Moment wrote:
2011-07-12 19:04:41 -0700

I love the Titanic! It made me cry )':

report
KatieBell
KatieBell wrote:
2011-07-12 12:54:05 -0700

im not into history that much exsept the histroy of japenese colture and texas revaloution

report
KatieBell
KatieBell wrote:
2011-07-12 12:53:08 -0700

yeah it is boring :P

report
Bloood hungrey 33$
Bloood hungrey 33$ wrote:
2011-07-12 10:53:34 -0700

not everyone died u know.

report
dakotajt
dakotajt wrote:
2011-07-12 10:27:37 -0700

i love titanic ive reserched it for 3 years and watched the move more than 30 times

report
goldenstar786
goldenstar786 wrote:
2011-07-12 10:19:12 -0700

its kinda boring

report
candylover9
candylover9 wrote:
2011-07-12 10:14:47 -0700

i wish i was on the titanic but then i would die boohoo i love the titanic

report
ludamunk_1748162
ludamunk_1748162 wrote:
2011-07-12 10:01:20 -0700

ive seen both titanics 1 and 2

report
yellow glitter 123
yellow glitter 123 wrote:
2011-07-12 10:00:57 -0700

I wish i cud see the titanic

report
Lozzywoo98
Lozzywoo98 wrote:
2011-07-12 10:00:55 -0700

im obsessed with the titanic!! i have pichures of it all around my room!!

report
Zonkers!
Zonkers! wrote:
2011-07-12 10:00:26 -0700

The movie stunk & Jack didn't really exist. One of the smoke stacks on the Titanic wasn't real, it was just there too make sure people new it was the biggest ship in the world.They buried the people from the Titanic in a graveyard in Halifax,NS.

report
spongegrl
spongegrl wrote:
2011-07-12 09:57:24 -0700

TITANIC IS MY FAVORITE MOVIE IN THE WORLD

report
the moon
the moon wrote:
2011-07-12 09:45:11 -0700

The movie titanic was awsome Cool

report
thepinkgirl
thepinkgirl wrote:
2011-07-12 09:43:37 -0700

i no its awsom but i hate t when they nuf fit its son sad

report
MiniGagaLover
MiniGagaLover wrote:
2011-07-12 09:43:21 -0700

i saw some of the movie

report
mistwiec37_1576131
mistwiec37_1576131 wrote:
2011-07-12 09:43:18 -0700

The Carpathia™ had an epic save. Tongue Out

report
-StephanieHeartsYew.
-StephanieHeartsYew. wrote:
2011-07-12 09:42:36 -0700

Shane Dawson LOVE this movie [x

report
buddy supmodel
buddy supmodel wrote:
2011-07-12 09:42:24 -0700

i love the movie but i hated all the other people to die but still great movie and great people that wre alive when it realy did happen

report
spparky123400
spparky123400 wrote:
2011-07-12 09:42:06 -0700

i cried in the movie its sooooooooo romantic luv it

report
spparky123400
spparky123400 wrote:
2011-07-12 09:42:05 -0700

i cried in the movie its sooooooooo romantic luv it

report
back to story
F1113423011890

How Did the Captain of theTitanic Die?

  • He sank with the Titanic.
  • He shot himself with a pistol before the ship sank.
  • He froze to death as he swam toward a lifeboat with a baby in his arms.
  • He died from a heart attack years after the Titanic sank.

related stories

Micro_titanic-micro
You probably have seen the Oscar-winning action/romance Titanic (1997) on either old videotape or...
Micro_titanic-micro
Experience it like never before in 3D and IMAX. Titanic - coming to theaters April 4, 2012.
Micro_leonardo-dicaprio_micro
Leonardo DiCaprio went from child star to Hollywood hunk in no time at all. Now he has won the he...

Random in the forums

Teh_Skittlez
Teh_Skittlez posted in Debating:
"Taidoku" wrote:it's wrong because society made it wrong how authoritarian  
reply 11 minutes
Boysrock50
Boysrock50 posted in General:
the junior mods and other debaters/regular forum posters
reply 11 minutes
Teh_Skittlez
Teh_Skittlez posted in Debating:
"kingofdisaster_" wrote:I think they do. I feel like if I say they don't, they'll attack me. Well. They haven't attacked me yet.  
reply 12 minutes
Teh_Skittlez
Teh_Skittlez posted in Debating:
"AlphaT" wrote: "Teh_Skittlez" wrote: "AlphaT" wrote: "Teh_Skittlez" wrote: Ghosts require more explanation than they provide answers Elaborate? Are you saying that they require more effort than they can give back, or that they hold more mystery than knowledge? There's some phenomena that goes unexplained. But that's the important part, we don't have an explanation. By using ghosts as a solution, we are making unexplained assumptions, you're just displacing your lack of explanation onto the ghost, rather than the event itself. And that's the other part, I haven't heard any physics based woo-free explanation for a disembodied intelligence that lacks a physical body but manages to interact with the physical world. So, for me it's basic Occam's razor. The more complicated answer could be true, but until we have evidence to support the assumptions made it's best to go with the simpler hypotheses that operate within the framework we already have.      First off, I do not believe in ghosts. But, why does this entity have to be intelligent? Why can't be some type of unknown energetic remnant of a past life that's being harbored in a given location? Also, how is nothing simpler than a hypothesis? Admitting to not having an explanation is not a bad thing, especially when you don't have one. There's nothing wrong with saying you haven't been convinced of any particular hypothesis so far, and therefore it remains unexplained to you. You aren't saying it was nothing, you're saying you don't know what it was.  How would we measure this remnant energy of a past life? How many joules should we expect to see? The reason we presume cognizance is because people asserting hypotheses about ghosts often assume that these spirits interact with the world and possess some understanding of cause and effect. 
reply 13 minutes
ChickenGoPowPow
Both. :3
reply 15 minutes