Kw-logo-smaller

Zooman Sam Book Review

Zooman Sam Book Review - Reviewed by Kidzworld on Dec 27, 2006
( Rating: 4 Star Rating)

Sam Krupnik wants to be a zookeeper. Wearing his zookeeper costume to Future Job Day, Sam starts teaching his class. But is teaching his class and his dog too much for Zooman Sam?

Author: Lois Lowry

Sam Krupnik has a problem. All the other boys in his class want to be firemen for Future Job Day but Sam wants to be a zookeeper and train animals. At the last minute, his parents make him a zookeeper suit with his name on it and everything. Showing up with his homemade Zooman Sam suit and 30 hats with a different animal on each makes Sam the hit of his class.


Zooman Sam is so popular that Sam does it again... and again and again. Every day Zooman Sam has to come up with new animal facts for everyone at school, even for the scary animals. Plus he has to train his food-crazy dog at home. Can he do it? Can Sam be Zooman Sam for 30 days with 30 hats? Or is it too much for a four year-old?


Lois Lowry has written another story about the Krupnik family. This time it's Sam's turn to have an adventure instead of his big sis Anastasia. Zooman Sam is a cute story about a kid who loves animals. It's a quick read and kinda goofy but it's fun. Check it out and see if Sam can become the 'Chief of Wonderfulness' or if it's too much for a four year-old to handle.


Zooman Sam Rating: 4

Related Stories:

  • The Tiger's Blood Book Review
  • Best of Judy Blume Set Book Review
  • Sammy Keyes and the Hotel Thief Book Review
  • More Book Reviews!
  • 0 Comments

    latest videos

    F989244339015

    What's the Scariest Animal?

    • Sharks.
    • Homework-asaurus Rex.
    • Spiders.
    • Big Sisters.

    related stories

    Random in the forums

    PerksBeingABookworm
    In my opinion, cursing in general is pretty tasteless. It's not exactly a behavior to admire.  However, in regards to the question, I don't think people who are 13 and under should be cursing. Not to sound condescending to those who are younger than me, but my reasoning is, many people who are in that particular age group don't fully comprehend the weight expletives carry.  Here is an example: A mother is out running errands in heavy traffic. Her 6 year old son is seated in the back of the car.  As she's about to make a turn, another vehicle cuts her off. Irritated, she curses the offender under her breath, unaware that her son has heard her. Later, while in a check-out line at a supermarket, her son, growing restless, stomps his foot and yells the same curse. The six year old didn't understand what he was saying, he was repeating what he'd heard from his mother. He didn't understand that the word was inappropriate and potentially offensive.  The average 13 year old (or even a 10 year old, for that matter), however, would understand that it was inappropriate and that it was offensive.   
    reply 3 minutes
    frooty-lips
    frooty-lips posted in Debating:
    "anna9grace7" wrote:. flirting with other girls. changing attiutudes. their parents.privacy.their intrestboys can be a pain in the butt, so letes discuuss what makes u mad bout boys. below! Same here girl:) LOL
    reply 19 minutes
    tweenblogger
    tweenblogger posted in Debating:
    Cursing in not very classy. Why do poeple curse? Honestly, whats the point?
    reply 22 minutes
    angel513
    angel513 posted in Debating:
    Lol:):):)
    reply about 1 hour
    tweenblogger
    tweenblogger posted in Debating:
    "american_brit" wrote:   "catsrcute9" wrote: Sure, some people think they are in love when really it is lust but there are plenty of people, gay and straight, that love each other. I believe that it would be beneficial if we kinda cut down on the baby making. The more people on earth, that means that more resources are being used. In a way gays are doing you a favor. Odds are, early on, gays were most likely killed for being different. So it wasn't like they had to chance to evolve .   If gays/lesbians we made to have babies then gays would not even exist. Just because a century old book says that gays cant be married doesn't mean people are going to listen to it. Modify you bible to the now times. Rules change, so should your's. Interesting... And how do you suggest we do that? Prevent people from having children? Slowly dispatch of the current population? I'm sorry. Life is the most precious  gift. I don't believe we have the right take that away from another. *cough cough* Back to the main topic at hand... I agree that "there are plenty of people, gay and straight, that love each other." You're not wrong in that assumption. However, there are all kinds of love -though at the root core it comes with willing the good others. (We should "love one another as He has loved us.") But the attraction and desire to be with another as as man and wife can be one? That's called lust. As a Christian, I believe that such physicality should be reserved for marriage with the intention of bringing new life into the world.  Like any group seen as different, homosexuals have been persecuted (ex: WWII) -as they still are. But let's take a looksie back in the past, shall we? In some cultures such as the Roman? Homosexual relationships were actually encouraged. Specifically, male relationships -many, not all, between those of striking age differences. Now do you believe these were sought out for pleasure or out of love? Haha, actually? The Book's been around for well over a century now... Perhaps, maybe there just might be a sufficient reason as to why. Now, to change the rules? Sorry,  no can do. They aren't mine to alter,  though they're certainly mine to follow (;     Amen to that! 
    reply about 1 hour

    play online games