"Singermms" wrote:Please stop and think before you call someone clueless
I did think, and I still believe you're clueless.
"Singermms" wrote:I bet your a bully.
What about my "a bully"? You can't bet someone else's possessions against them,
"Singermms" wrote:I reported you for calling me clueless
I'm pretty sure even on this site, that's not breaking any rules. You've had many chances to prove you're not clueless, yet you blew all of them.
"Singermms" wrote:and for keep arguing about my opinion
Trying to create productive discussion isn't against the rules either.
"Singermms" wrote:so I'm not going to post back. Or can you at least please define what you are trying to say.
Don't go back on yourself. The prospect of "explaining myself better" would most likely result in you having another go, which is why you suggested it. However the statement before that claims you've left this conversation, which would make your request void.
You're not using that word right, but I'll act like that is the word you wanted to use.
"Singermms" wrote:please define what you are trying to say.
The definition of what I'm trying to say is; that Taylor Swift isn't a good songwriter, that you're punching well above your weight and that you can't comprehend most of what I'm saying.
My initial point is that saying someone's interpretation does not exist is silly and will result in you never being taken seriously in discussions ever again.