"Duck Soup" wrote:

"InsertOriginalUsername" wrote:

"Duck Soup" wrote:

"InsertOriginalUsername" wrote:

"AlphaT" wrote:

"-Allie-" wrote:

"Duck Soup" wrote:

"InsertOriginalUsername" wrote:

"Duck Soup" wrote:

"InsertOriginalUsername" wrote:

"Duck Soup" wrote:

"InsertOriginalUsername" wrote:

"Duck Soup" wrote:

"InsertOriginalUsername" wrote:

"Duck Soup" wrote:

There is no evidence for "Witchcraft". Everything can be explained through Science and Human Psychology.

"Everything" .. huh. Straight to Harvard with you.

Alright, let me rephrase. "dere iz n0 evidince 4 'wichkraft'// Every-ding cn b laned throo sicense nd humen sicologie" Satisified?

Actually not really .. you missed the point of my blatant quoting What you are saying is not correct. Not everything is provable by science ... Like, have you ever seen the movie The happening .. "There are forces at work beyond our understanding" Science proves .... some things, maybe a lot of things, not everything.

What I am saying is my opinion. In my opinion, (for me, in my personal "belief" system etc) every single unusual or supposedly supernatural activity can be explained by using Science and Human Psychology. Yes, I've seen the movie 'The Happening"... did you ever notice how... um.. "fictional" it was? And how it could be explained (if you really put the effort in, of course) by science, not "Witchcraft"? "Facts do not cease to exist, simply because they are being ignored."

Another one of them atheists.

You think Witchcraft is a Religion? Please. Do continue.

Wicca.

The Wiccan Religion uses Witchcraft. Witchcraft is seen as a sorcery, sorcery is not a religion. It has religious elements, but it is not a religion. It is a practice.

Wicca English pronunciation: "is a modern pagan religion that draws upon a diverse set of ancient pagan religious motifs for its theological structure and ritual practice." Hmmm wikipedia thinks it is.

1. Um.......Wikipedia is never a site to devote to...since its invaluebale for crebability.

Did your teacher tell you that?

Not using Wikipedia as a reference to a conversation, I always thought was common knowledge. Obviously not. Using it as a starting source for any information is good, just as long as you don't only use Wikipedia.

  Oh you're wrong. You can use Wikipedia as a reference to a conversation .. but not as a credible source.   .... Well that's obviously what you meant so ... I lose.

Nonsense! We have come to a mutual agreement to agree to disagree! It was lovely working with you Mr Stevenson (first last name that comes to mind). *Shakes hands*