"ps3master" wrote:lol you are obviously another biased,hateful,and disgraceful anti-Christian atheist. My proof? My proof is you and me and everyone else,my proof is the fact that all your so called scie tists have are still unproven ideas of the creation of earth universe and life,my proof is the fact that you can't disprove the Bibl and it continues to be the largest religion out there,my proof is that when I pray my prayers are answered. Where's your proof kid?
Gosh you are just so adorable, I want to fix you a warm glass of milk, read you a bedtime story, pinch your cheeks, and say "good night" to you before turning your light off and leaving, taking extra care to have the door open just a crack so some light still shines in. :3•
The scientific community accepts that the Earth was created through the process of accretion from the protoplanetary disc in our solar system ~4.54bya. •
Abiogenesis is widely accepted by the scientific community as how life arose on Earth. Extremely strong evidence that supports it is the Miller-Urey Experiment which showed that amino acids (which are essential to the formation of life) could have been created on Earth, ~3.5bya with its early conditions. There are other lesser known ideas of how life arose, such as panspermia, but they're not as accepted as abiogenesis. But since this is science, it's okay to not have all of the answers, and it's even better to not make things up and pretend you do.•
The burden of proof lies upon the person making the assertion that something exists, or is true. If that weren't the case, we could see ridiculous conversations like this:
Little Timmy: The PS3 can go through time and even spew out money!
Bob: Prove it!
Little Timmy: You can't prove that it doesn't.
Little Timmy: God exists!
Bob: Prove it!
Little Timmy: You can't prove he doesn't.•
Argumentum ad populum•
Anecdotal evidence is not proof
"ps3master" wrote:ok fine,I'll just reply and say rude things about his "religion" also try replying to my whole post.
Try taking into consideration that when people reply to only certain parts of your post, it's because it was intended.
"ps3master" wrote:So where's this "proof" you have off Gods absence?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!??!??!?!?!?!?!?!
So where's this "proof" you have off
Allahs Shiva/Vishnu/Brahmas Buddha