sigh  Guys calling people or things "gross" is really a bad way to argue anything.

---

"Alexithymia" wrote:

"SmileyKiley" wrote:

For 1 it's gross. and for two if you beilieve in God why would you do it idk. But you will not go to heaven you will go to hail andyou ll me torth again beilieve mr not it's true.

Whether something is gross or not is subjective. I hate bananas, but I'm not gonna stop anyone from eating one.  As for your religion, your church wouldn't be forced to marry anyone it didn't want to; the type of marriage that gays want is the legal contract called "marriage." 

These people disgust me...im All For Gay Marriage...you disgust  ,me..

---

"mr. dominick" wrote:

"-LadyOfTheWood" wrote:

No one had to tell you anything? Huh. Wow, that's impressive.

No offense but it seems as if you are the one patronizing people here. You don't want to get into a debate with me.

Well...patronize is a strong word...and that's debateable if I want to get into a debate with you.

---

"skylar444" wrote:

"-LadyOfTheWood" wrote:

"skylar444" wrote:

"-LadyOfTheWood" wrote:

By the way, why do you believe what you believe? Hm? Did you come up with what you believe all by yourself? Did they just pop into your head, magically? I'm guessing no. Of course I've let some people and words influence me, if I didn't, I'd be an airhead.  And please. Don't argue with me unless you are capable of using proper grammar and punctuation.

Your quotes are so confusing... Are you talking to me? Or him?

Well excuse me. And I was talking to him.

I wasn't blaming you for the quotes... I was just saying that they got messed up. Don't get an attitude with me over a simple comment.

Pardon me, and I could be wrong, but sarcastically calling someone "Honey" is pretty snippy.

---

because, the bible is against   gay marrage that is why I am against it,and to me I thank it is dumb any way,

---

"mr. dominick" wrote:

"-LadyOfTheWood" wrote:

No one had to tell you anything? Huh. Wow, that's impressive.

No offense but it seems as if you are the one patronizing people here. You don't want to get into a debate with me.

Oh really?

---

"mr. dominick" wrote:

 First off, that is my opinion no one had to tell me anything. And second of all I am not patronizing anybody here. And third of all if I wanted to argue I wouldn't come o the computer to do so.

If you didn't want people to comment on your opinion, you shouldn't have commented on LadyOfTheWood's. Whether you intended to patronize her or not, you accused her of not thinking for herself, and then ignored her when she tried to defend herself. 

---

"AlphaT" wrote:

"mr. dominick" wrote:

"-LadyOfTheWood" wrote:

No one had to tell you anything? Huh. Wow, that's impressive.

No offense but it seems as if you are the one patronizing people here. You don't want to get into a debate with me.

Well...patronize is a strong word...and that's debateable if I want to get into a debate with you.

trolol

---

"Alexithymia" wrote:

"mr. dominick" wrote:

First off, that is my opinion no one had to tell me anything. And second of all I am not patronizing anybody here. And third of all if I wanted to argue I wouldn't come o the computer to do so.

If you didn't want people to comment on your opinion, you shouldn't have commented on LadyOfTheWood's. Whether you intended to patronize her or not, you accused her of not thinking for herself, and then ignored her when she tried to defend herself.

Actually I did respond to her opinion thank you very much

---

"-LadyOfTheWood" wrote:

"AlphaT" wrote:

"mr. dominick" wrote:

"-LadyOfTheWood" wrote:

No one had to tell you anything? Huh. Wow, that's impressive.

No offense but it seems as if you are the one patronizing people here. You don't want to get into a debate with me.

Well...patronize is a strong word...and that's debateable if I want to get into a debate with you.

trolol

No.....what I said was completely in the right and had no affliction to anyone...so I am not considered trolling.

---