Of course if you take away A Christians guide and Holy Book, count all records in Rome for Jesus

The Bible is not a history book, unless you decide to take it on faith that a single book allegedly dictated by God is fact. There is not a single contemporary account of Jesus Christ.

and also cririze thier mental capacity and thier intlect based on thier beliefs

I haven't even remotely done such a thing in this thread. However, just because it's your belief (or opinion), does not make it exempt of criticism or mockery. There is such a thing as stupid opinions. 

2. You have made it to where a Christian cannot even attempt to use thier scientific handbook as evidence for thier beliefs

If I make a history book that says Stalin was the first American president, I cannot throw that book in your face when you ask for proof. The Bible can't prove the validity of the Bible.

The Bible has more science then Hawking and Darwin ever  cane up with.

The Bible is not science. It did not test and record the results of anything. The things described in the Bible are supernatural, and impossible to reproduce, even with modern day technology and science.

3. You have manifested a religious act of bigotry between these two...not letting Christians use thier evidence.

The Bible is not evidence for the Bible. 

And dont give me no comeback saying that darwin only studied science and built upon it blah blah blah just focus on my key points and the top paragraph.Thank you

Darwin only studied science and built upon it. The main difference between science and religion is that one adheres to dogma, and the other is a dynamic body of knowledge that shifts as discoveries are made.

---

Darwin basically published his theory of evolution because another scientist was planning on doing it before him, iirc.  It's been awhile since we did the life of Darwin. 

---

I was going to leave a long and thought-provoking post, but I think the rest of you pretty much summed it up.

---

He's God. 'Nuff said.

---