"AlphaT" wrote:

Yea thats....well...anyways, evolution is still in the theroy stage.

Things like this are why I don't believe you know anything about what you're talking about.  Stage? There is no hierarchy. Theories don't become scientific facts, despite parts of them being accepted as facts, because theories are explanations of facts. For example, Gravitational Theory explains gravity. The Theory of Evolution explains the fact of evolution.  

---

"Alexithymia" wrote:

"AlphaT" wrote:

Yea thats....well...anyways, evolution is still in the theroy stage.

Things like this are why I don't believe you know anything about what you're talking about. Stage? There is no hierarchy. Theories don't become scientific facts, despite parts of them being accepted as facts, because theories are explanations of facts. For example, Gravitational Theory explains gravity. The Theory of Evolution explains the fact of evolution.

Gravity is a lie. I believe the flying spagheti Monster just pulls us down.

---

@Skylar444 Parts of the Big Bang Theory are accepted as facts; the same goes for The Theory of Evolution. We always need to leave room for new information and edits to be made, but pieces of the theories can be beyond reasonable doubt, such as humans evolving from another ape species.  As for God, I never claimed that the Big Bang Theory disproved him. The only reason I don't believe in God is because of the lack of proof for the supernatural claim. 

---

"AlphaT" wrote:

"Alexithymia" wrote:

"AlphaT" wrote:

Yea thats....well...anyways, evolution is still in the theroy stage.

Things like this are why I don't believe you know anything about what you're talking about. Stage? There is no hierarchy. Theories don't become scientific facts, despite parts of them being accepted as facts, because theories are explanations of facts. For example, Gravitational Theory explains gravity. The Theory of Evolution explains the fact of evolution.

Gravity is a lie. I believe the flying spagheti Monster just pulls us down.

Another reason why I can't take you seriously. Every time you're losing, you resort to nonsense. 

---

"hugebear" wrote:

"Alexithymia" wrote:

"skylar444" wrote:

"Vertigo" wrote:

"skylar444" wrote:

"Vertigo" wrote:

"hugebear" wrote:

Everyone please respects everyone and NO ONE has the proofs either way. I thanks you in advance

*sigh* Atheists have many proofs. Religious have none.

Actually, no. Nobody has PROOF.

Do a little bit of research.. then we'll talk.

I have. What I mean is, nobody has enough proof to say that "YES, this is true!" or "NO, this isn't true!" If they did, it'd be PROVEN. If I recall, a theory can never be proven. Only disproven. The Big Bang THEORY is not proven to be true, nor are any of the other scientific ideas. But there is no scientific law that states that God does not exist. There is also no law that states that God does exist. In my opinion, there is no proof until it's proven. Weird, yes, but that's how I see it. "Proof" means nothing until it's enough to prove something. The Religion vs Science argument is a cycle. Neither idea will ever be proven, because there's no way to know until you die. So it just ends up coming down to opinions and beliefs. I don't know why people insist on arguing it. It's not like either idea hurts anyone.

Theories are explanations that are based on several facts and can be edited. Theories can be so solid that they reach the point we're it would be illogical to deny them, at that point they can be treated as facts.

Im confused and i does think its not the 100% proof  and i wanna think more before i says me further opinions

100% for a whole theory? No, because theories can always  be edited, but pieces of theories can be beyond reasonable doubt. Remember, scientific theories cover a lot of information. 

---

"Alexithymia" wrote:

@Skylar444 Parts of the Big Bang Theory are accepted as facts; the same goes for The Theory of Evolution. We always need to leave room for new information and edits to be made, but pieces of the theories can be beyond reasonable doubt, such as humans evolving from another ape species.  As for God, I never claimed that the Big Bang Theory disproved him. The only reason I don't believe in God is because of the lack of proof for the supernatural claim. 

Ah. Understood. I'm religious. I've always found the big bangs theory to be a little sketchy. But I believe in evolution.

---

"realKnuckles" wrote:

"realKnuckles" wrote:

1. I'm an atheist 2. AlphaT, I know you're hateful, but this isn't the time, nor the place 3. Alexithyma, I already had tons of respect for you, now I have even more

Thanks  

---

"AlphaT" wrote:

Gravity is a lie. I believe the flying spagheti Monster just pulls us down.

That's just immature.

---

"Vertigo" wrote:

"AlphaT" wrote:

Because I trust an all loving being any day of the week before I trust some guy with a certificate that says hes smart but in reality he has never lived, expressed hisself, or even done something worth a care.

"Hisself?" You mean "Himself." Either way, he's smarter than you.

I is a understandin I is misegneated in my verbal statures..so get off of it haws. Anyway, I believe Exp. is better than any peice of paper. Kat dont encourage him please!   Yea I put a smiley like a Jr.Mod who means buisness.

---

Yet again, the same person derails this off topic.

---