.png "MLB The Show 18 PS4 Game Review")
.png "Burnout Paradise Remastered PS4 Game Review")
Posted almost 5 years ago
"AlphaT" wrote:
And I have. For the past year, which is why I know that YEC is true.
"Teh_Skittlez" wrote:
"AlphaT" wrote:
Right, I could say the same about evolution...but honestly opinions don't matter much in a debate.
"Teh_Skittlez" wrote:
"AlphaT" wrote:
We know that animals adapt by changes in allele copies over generation to generation. We also know the limits of these....of which in this young earth a simple organism could not have become more complex to the point of humans.
"Teh_Skittlez" wrote:
"AlphaT" wrote:
I'm sorry, but anyone can tell you....no one, not a Hawking, Hitchens, or Dawkins knows evolution fully. Why do you think people study things like phylogenetics? Many many things are still a mystery when it comes to evolution. And I have pretty much devoted the past year to learning these things. So, yes I know a lot about evolution and genetics. You're taking things that I said a year ago and applying them to now.
"-Allie-" wrote:
Exactly what I'm asking. Do not debate on subjects you do not fully understand. Evolution being the important one. You haven't taken basic biology and if you're admitted now months ago you knew nothing, think about what you still don't know at 13. You've had 6 good debator's here tell you you don't get it fully. I'm asking you to please learn it. The bad thing is other kids are reading what you debate and think its true when you're points are way off. Can you think of the other kids on here please?
"AlphaT" wrote:
When did I ever say that I did take high school biology, and how is that relevant? I'm also not sure who you are referring to when you say "Matt". And if I did admit that it would of been months ago when I really did not know a lot about it.
Oh so are you now saying you've taken high school biology? Because Matt wiped the floor with you, then you admitted you debate without real knowledge on this topic. It's all relevant and I'm not fixing the thread for you.
They're studying how evolution works, and how it happens. We already know it happens.
Young earth creationism isn't even worth debating. It's a bad joke.
You're right, opinions don't matter in a debate. Young earth creationism is merely an opinion unfounded by science. Evolution is a biological fact. It's not an opinion, and it's really not up for debate. We know organisms evolve, and we know that it took more than 6000 years for it to happen. Evolution isn't false because of young earth creationism, it's the other way around, YEC isn't true because of evolution (and more). The amount of evidence refuting YEC is huge. I encourage you to research any of the topics in the list I provided you earlier through a secular source.
And that's why I did one search, found the crater topic, mentioned it, and you didn't know it?
Posted almost 5 years ago
Why did you put OEC evidence on here, just based on one quick search? Don't you need to know what you are talking about before you use it in a debate."Teh_Skittlez" wrote:
"AlphaT" wrote:
And I have. For the past year, which is why I know that YEC is true.
"Teh_Skittlez" wrote:
"AlphaT" wrote:
Right, I could say the same about evolution...but honestly opinions don't matter much in a debate.
"Teh_Skittlez" wrote:
"AlphaT" wrote:
We know that animals adapt by changes in allele copies over generation to generation. We also know the limits of these....of which in this young earth a simple organism could not have become more complex to the point of humans.
"Teh_Skittlez" wrote:
"AlphaT" wrote:
I'm sorry, but anyone can tell you....no one, not a Hawking, Hitchens, or Dawkins knows evolution fully. Why do you think people study things like phylogenetics? Many many things are still a mystery when it comes to evolution. And I have pretty much devoted the past year to learning these things. So, yes I know a lot about evolution and genetics. You're taking things that I said a year ago and applying them to now.
"-Allie-" wrote:
Exactly what I'm asking. Do not debate on subjects you do not fully understand. Evolution being the important one. You haven't taken basic biology and if you're admitted now months ago you knew nothing, think about what you still don't know at 13. You've had 6 good debator's here tell you you don't get it fully. I'm asking you to please learn it. The bad thing is other kids are reading what you debate and think its true when you're points are way off. Can you think of the other kids on here please?
"AlphaT" wrote:
When did I ever say that I did take high school biology, and how is that relevant? I'm also not sure who you are referring to when you say "Matt". And if I did admit that it would of been months ago when I really did not know a lot about it.
Oh so are you now saying you've taken high school biology? Because Matt wiped the floor with you, then you admitted you debate without real knowledge on this topic. It's all relevant and I'm not fixing the thread for you.
They're studying how evolution works, and how it happens. We already know it happens.
Young earth creationism isn't even worth debating. It's a bad joke.
You're right, opinions don't matter in a debate. Young earth creationism is merely an opinion unfounded by science. Evolution is a biological fact. It's not an opinion, and it's really not up for debate. We know organisms evolve, and we know that it took more than 6000 years for it to happen. Evolution isn't false because of young earth creationism, it's the other way around, YEC isn't true because of evolution (and more). The amount of evidence refuting YEC is huge. I encourage you to research any of the topics in the list I provided you earlier through a secular source.
And that's why I did one search, found the crater topic, mentioned it, and you didn't know it?
Posted almost 5 years ago
Posted almost 5 years ago
Posted almost 5 years ago
"AlphaT" wrote:
Why did you put OEC evidence on here, just based on one quick search? Don't you need to know what you are talking about before you use it in a debate.
"Teh_Skittlez" wrote:
"AlphaT" wrote:
And I have. For the past year, which is why I know that YEC is true.
"Teh_Skittlez" wrote:
"AlphaT" wrote:
Right, I could say the same about evolution...but honestly opinions don't matter much in a debate.
"Teh_Skittlez" wrote:
"AlphaT" wrote:
We know that animals adapt by changes in allele copies over generation to generation. We also know the limits of these....of which in this young earth a simple organism could not have become more complex to the point of humans.
"Teh_Skittlez" wrote:
"AlphaT" wrote:
I'm sorry, but anyone can tell you....no one, not a Hawking, Hitchens, or Dawkins knows evolution fully. Why do you think people study things like phylogenetics? Many many things are still a mystery when it comes to evolution. And I have pretty much devoted the past year to learning these things. So, yes I know a lot about evolution and genetics. You're taking things that I said a year ago and applying them to now.
"-Allie-" wrote:
Exactly what I'm asking. Do not debate on subjects you do not fully understand. Evolution being the important one. You haven't taken basic biology and if you're admitted now months ago you knew nothing, think about what you still don't know at 13. You've had 6 good debator's here tell you you don't get it fully. I'm asking you to please learn it. The bad thing is other kids are reading what you debate and think its true when you're points are way off. Can you think of the other kids on here please?
"AlphaT" wrote:
When did I ever say that I did take high school biology, and how is that relevant? I'm also not sure who you are referring to when you say "Matt". And if I did admit that it would of been months ago when I really did not know a lot about it.
Oh so are you now saying you've taken high school biology? Because Matt wiped the floor with you, then you admitted you debate without real knowledge on this topic. It's all relevant and I'm not fixing the thread for you.
They're studying how evolution works, and how it happens. We already know it happens.
Young earth creationism isn't even worth debating. It's a bad joke.
You're right, opinions don't matter in a debate. Young earth creationism is merely an opinion unfounded by science. Evolution is a biological fact. It's not an opinion, and it's really not up for debate. We know organisms evolve, and we know that it took more than 6000 years for it to happen. Evolution isn't false because of young earth creationism, it's the other way around, YEC isn't true because of evolution (and more). The amount of evidence refuting YEC is huge. I encourage you to research any of the topics in the list I provided you earlier through a secular source.
And that's why I did one search, found the crater topic, mentioned it, and you didn't know it?
I checked the sources. It checked out as far as I was concerned. It was as reliable as any source I've found on the internet.
But really, what's with all the crater impacts if the Earth is only 6000 years old?
Posted almost 5 years ago
"SuperFireAnt" wrote:
HAH i'm just kidding, i'm lil jalenj, i have multiple accounts because i get banned a lot. I WOULD be offended if it werent so easy to create new accounts XD
Take your petty need to rebel against authority somewhere else.
It's filling this thread with garbage completely unrelated to the topic.
Posted almost 5 years ago
Well, with the recent fiasco here I haven't had time to research it. I'll look over it after dinner."Teh_Skittlez" wrote:
"AlphaT" wrote:
Why did you put OEC evidence on here, just based on one quick search? Don't you need to know what you are talking about before you use it in a debate.
"Teh_Skittlez" wrote:
"AlphaT" wrote:
And I have. For the past year, which is why I know that YEC is true.
"Teh_Skittlez" wrote:
"AlphaT" wrote:
Right, I could say the same about evolution...but honestly opinions don't matter much in a debate.
"Teh_Skittlez" wrote:
"AlphaT" wrote:
We know that animals adapt by changes in allele copies over generation to generation. We also know the limits of these....of which in this young earth a simple organism could not have become more complex to the point of humans.
"Teh_Skittlez" wrote:
"AlphaT" wrote:
I'm sorry, but anyone can tell you....no one, not a Hawking, Hitchens, or Dawkins knows evolution fully. Why do you think people study things like phylogenetics? Many many things are still a mystery when it comes to evolution. And I have pretty much devoted the past year to learning these things. So, yes I know a lot about evolution and genetics. You're taking things that I said a year ago and applying them to now.
"-Allie-" wrote:
Exactly what I'm asking. Do not debate on subjects you do not fully understand. Evolution being the important one. You haven't taken basic biology and if you're admitted now months ago you knew nothing, think about what you still don't know at 13. You've had 6 good debator's here tell you you don't get it fully. I'm asking you to please learn it. The bad thing is other kids are reading what you debate and think its true when you're points are way off. Can you think of the other kids on here please?
"AlphaT" wrote:
When did I ever say that I did take high school biology, and how is that relevant? I'm also not sure who you are referring to when you say "Matt". And if I did admit that it would of been months ago when I really did not know a lot about it.
Oh so are you now saying you've taken high school biology? Because Matt wiped the floor with you, then you admitted you debate without real knowledge on this topic. It's all relevant and I'm not fixing the thread for you.
They're studying how evolution works, and how it happens. We already know it happens.
Young earth creationism isn't even worth debating. It's a bad joke.
You're right, opinions don't matter in a debate. Young earth creationism is merely an opinion unfounded by science. Evolution is a biological fact. It's not an opinion, and it's really not up for debate. We know organisms evolve, and we know that it took more than 6000 years for it to happen. Evolution isn't false because of young earth creationism, it's the other way around, YEC isn't true because of evolution (and more). The amount of evidence refuting YEC is huge. I encourage you to research any of the topics in the list I provided you earlier through a secular source.
And that's why I did one search, found the crater topic, mentioned it, and you didn't know it?
I checked the sources. It checked out as far as I was concerned. It was as reliable as any source I've found on the internet.
But really, what's with all the crater impacts if the Earth is only 6000 years old?
woo hoo i have a new hater. Life is good.
Posted almost 5 years ago