x

Meet New Friends!

Recommended friends are based on your interests. Make sure they are up to date.

Friends ff8c072dd79a91c1300f032d674241a8d64367100ffb1f25fa3f9bec4a05319f
Kidzworld Logo

Politics and Religion

How do we know God was not created?

← Previous 1
Posted By:
AlphaT
AlphaT
Member since:
March 2011
Status:
Online

Posts: 10965
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 4 years ago
Well.....its all in the root definition of God. God, meaning boundless to any law of matter, is boundless, as a binding of God would indicate something on the 'other side' of the boundary had to be threr before him and more powerful than him to limit him. Since, and hence the definition of God,  he is boundless, nothing is above him, so therefore, you can make a logical assumption he is the Alpha and Omega.


Posted By:
Vertigo_2009544 Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Vertigo_2009544
Member since:
January 2012
Status:
Offline

Posts: 2745
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 4 years ago

"AlphaT" wrote:

God, meaning boundless to any law of matter, is boundless
I hate to use a paradox to contradict your god.. but I will. What if God made an immovable object? He couldn't. If he did, he wouldn't be able to move it. But if he could move it, then it was never truly immovable.

"AlphaT" wrote:

Since, and hence the definition of God,  he is boundless, nothing is above him, so therefore, you can make a logical assumption he is the Alpha and Omega.
Steven Hawking said something along the lines of, "Since time was created at the same instant the universe was, nothing could have been before it." Everything needs time to exist, even your god. Now, if God did come into existence at that instant, he would be an unnecessary being, since the universe was able to come into existence without him.


Posted By:
AlphaT
AlphaT
Member since:
March 2011
Status:
Online

Posts: 10965
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 4 years ago

"Vertigo" wrote:

"AlphaT" wrote:

God, meaning boundless to any law of matter, is boundless
I hate to use a paradox to contradict your god.. but I will. What if God made an immovable object? He couldn't. If he did, he wouldn't be able to move it. But if he could move it, then it was never truly immovable.

"AlphaT" wrote:

Since, and hence the definition of God, he is boundless, nothing is above him, so therefore, you can make a logical assumption he is the Alpha and Omega.
Steven Hawking said something along the lines of, "Since time was created at the same instant the universe was, nothing could have been before it." Everything needs time to exist, even your god. Now, if God did come into existence at that instant, he would be an unnecessary being, since the universe was able to come into existence without him.
1. God is omnipotent.....he can't create an immovable object....how does that even help your case by saying he cant create an imovable object? 2. Thats with the belief that the universe started by itself...its like trying to prove that your right about your belief by using theories from your belief...when truly you cant do this since its rooted in a bad belief.


Posted By:
MikhailTal Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
MikhailTal
Member since:
April 2012
Status:
Offline

Posts: 443
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 4 years ago

"Vertigo" wrote:

"AlphaT" wrote:

God, meaning boundless to any law of matter, is boundless
I hate to use a paradox to contradict your god.. but I will. What if God made an immovable object? He couldn't. If he did, he wouldn't be able to move it. But if he could move it, then it was never truly immovable.

"AlphaT" wrote:

Since, and hence the definition of God,  he is boundless, nothing is above him, so therefore, you can make a logical assumption he is the Alpha and Omega.
Steven Hawking said something along the lines of, "Since time was created at the same instant the universe was, nothing could have been before it." Everything needs time to exist, even your god. Now, if God did come into existence at that instant, he would be an unnecessary being, since the universe was able to come into existence without him.
A supernatural omnipotent deity is not restricted by universal laws, including the paradox. Such a being would be able to create an object that he can and can't move, giving it those two properties simultaneously. The same applies to your other sentence.


Posted By:
AlphaT
AlphaT
Member since:
March 2011
Status:
Online

Posts: 10965
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 4 years ago

"MikhailTal" wrote:

"Vertigo" wrote:

"AlphaT" wrote:

God, meaning boundless to any law of matter, is boundless
I hate to use a paradox to contradict your god.. but I will. What if God made an immovable object? He couldn't. If he did, he wouldn't be able to move it. But if he could move it, then it was never truly immovable.

"AlphaT" wrote:

Since, and hence the definition of God, he is boundless, nothing is above him, so therefore, you can make a logical assumption he is the Alpha and Omega.
Steven Hawking said something along the lines of, "Since time was created at the same instant the universe was, nothing could have been before it." Everything needs time to exist, even your god. Now, if God did come into existence at that instant, he would be an unnecessary being, since the universe was able to come into existence without him.
A supernatural omnipotent deity is not restricted by universal laws, including the paradox. Such a being would be able to create an object that he can and can't move, giving it those two properties simultaneously. The same applies to your other sentence.
Well thats redefining omnipotence.


Posted By:
MikhailTal Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
MikhailTal
Member since:
April 2012
Status:
Offline

Posts: 443
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 4 years ago

"AlphaT" wrote:

"MikhailTal" wrote:

"Vertigo" wrote:

"AlphaT" wrote:

God, meaning boundless to any law of matter, is boundless
I hate to use a paradox to contradict your god.. but I will. What if God made an immovable object? He couldn't. If he did, he wouldn't be able to move it. But if he could move it, then it was never truly immovable.

"AlphaT" wrote:

Since, and hence the definition of God, he is boundless, nothing is above him, so therefore, you can make a logical assumption he is the Alpha and Omega.
Steven Hawking said something along the lines of, "Since time was created at the same instant the universe was, nothing could have been before it." Everything needs time to exist, even your god. Now, if God did come into existence at that instant, he would be an unnecessary being, since the universe was able to come into existence without him.
A supernatural omnipotent deity is not restricted by universal laws, including the paradox. Such a being would be able to create an object that he can and can't move, giving it those two properties simultaneously. The same applies to your other sentence.
Well thats redefining omnipotence.
lol.


Posted By:
AlphaT
AlphaT
Member since:
March 2011
Status:
Online

Posts: 10965
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 4 years ago

"MikhailTal" wrote:

"AlphaT" wrote:

"MikhailTal" wrote:

"Vertigo" wrote:

"AlphaT" wrote:

God, meaning boundless to any law of matter, is boundless
I hate to use a paradox to contradict your god.. but I will. What if God made an immovable object? He couldn't. If he did, he wouldn't be able to move it. But if he could move it, then it was never truly immovable.

"AlphaT" wrote:

Since, and hence the definition of God, he is boundless, nothing is above him, so therefore, you can make a logical assumption he is the Alpha and Omega.
Steven Hawking said something along the lines of, "Since time was created at the same instant the universe was, nothing could have been before it." Everything needs time to exist, even your god. Now, if God did come into existence at that instant, he would be an unnecessary being, since the universe was able to come into existence without him.
A supernatural omnipotent deity is not restricted by universal laws, including the paradox. Such a being would be able to create an object that he can and can't move, giving it those two properties simultaneously. The same applies to your other sentence.
Well thats redefining omnipotence.
lol.
I mean it is....God is onmipotent, but not limitless.


Posted By:
MikhailTal Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
MikhailTal
Member since:
April 2012
Status:
Offline

Posts: 443
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 4 years ago

"AlphaT" wrote:

"MikhailTal" wrote:

"AlphaT" wrote:

"MikhailTal" wrote:

"Vertigo" wrote:

"AlphaT" wrote:

God, meaning boundless to any law of matter, is boundless
I hate to use a paradox to contradict your god.. but I will. What if God made an immovable object? He couldn't. If he did, he wouldn't be able to move it. But if he could move it, then it was never truly immovable.

"AlphaT" wrote:

Since, and hence the definition of God, he is boundless, nothing is above him, so therefore, you can make a logical assumption he is the Alpha and Omega.
Steven Hawking said something along the lines of, "Since time was created at the same instant the universe was, nothing could have been before it." Everything needs time to exist, even your god. Now, if God did come into existence at that instant, he would be an unnecessary being, since the universe was able to come into existence without him.
A supernatural omnipotent deity is not restricted by universal laws, including the paradox. Such a being would be able to create an object that he can and can't move, giving it those two properties simultaneously. The same applies to your other sentence.
Well thats redefining omnipotence.
lol.
I mean it is....God is onmipotent, but not limitless.
This is some bad baiting, get new material.


Posted By:
AlphaT
AlphaT
Member since:
March 2011
Status:
Online

Posts: 10965
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 4 years ago

"MikhailTal" wrote:

"AlphaT" wrote:

"MikhailTal" wrote:

"AlphaT" wrote:

"MikhailTal" wrote:

"Vertigo" wrote:

"AlphaT" wrote:

God, meaning boundless to any law of matter, is boundless
I hate to use a paradox to contradict your god.. but I will. What if God made an immovable object? He couldn't. If he did, he wouldn't be able to move it. But if he could move it, then it was never truly immovable.

"AlphaT" wrote:

Since, and hence the definition of God, he is boundless, nothing is above him, so therefore, you can make a logical assumption he is the Alpha and Omega.
Steven Hawking said something along the lines of, "Since time was created at the same instant the universe was, nothing could have been before it." Everything needs time to exist, even your god. Now, if God did come into existence at that instant, he would be an unnecessary being, since the universe was able to come into existence without him.
A supernatural omnipotent deity is not restricted by universal laws, including the paradox. Such a being would be able to create an object that he can and can't move, giving it those two properties simultaneously. The same applies to your other sentence.
Well thats redefining omnipotence.
lol.
I mean it is....God is onmipotent, but not limitless.
This is some bad baiting, get new material.
Theres no baiting. I simpiky am saying God is omnipotent, but not limitless.


Posted By:
kd1229 Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
kd1229
Member since:
July 2012
Status:
Offline

Posts: 137
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 4 years ago
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? "Epicurus"


← Previous 1

Latest Forum Posts

religeon

religeon

religeon

religeon

religeon

religeon

religeon

religeon

religeon

religeon

Latest Videos

Play Online Games