Back left 6d79ffa2165c70419b5d81367025d889a832b878a14a24f303dd5f6f59a4f2c5
Back right 7131bbac0729874ea35f73598ddf94d2e1f7db07d23b55f12e0a2064353ff6d7

Damascus suffering from LARGE explosions, Israel may be involved

Celebs cartoon cfce93feab0316bf700026de7ec97f7de6e9ad1915d2ce24ce54a99a68a2b199
Posted over 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Posts: 7276

I think your missing the point. Until Canada did anything.....they wouldnt just fly over bombs because they CAN or Canada said they had some. It pained me greatly to type that that's such a horrible analogy since Canada is a fabulous country.

Potato

I Support Equal Rights  


Posted over 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
it was a example if USA was were Israel is now.

Biblical Resurcher,Rabbi


Posted over 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Posts: 7276

The US could have bombed Syria instead of Israel is what I'm trying to point out. But they didn't and they wouldn't on the info they have now.  smile

Potato

I Support Equal Rights  


Posted over 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef

"-Allie-" wrote:

The US could have bombed Syria instead of Israel is what I'm trying to point out. But they didn't and they wouldn't on the info they have now.  smile


But the U.S. is not of such an imminent threat. We also have neutrality laws. "Don't fire until fired upon" is a general rule of thumb. Sorry but...gen.e is right. Israel did what they had to do in order to protect itself from imminent threat.



Posted over 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Posts: 7276

Oh great, now the other bomb happy person on here. And I've called you both that before. Tongue Out Maybe its a boy thing, who knows? Gen is not correct. You don't bomb a country that sits next to you bc they might have bombs that could hurt your counrty. If that was the case, the planet would be gone. There is no law anywhere that says that's ok. They were only in imminent threat in their own minds.

BTW, it was TWO separate attacks. It's called being the agressor not practicing self defense.

Potato

I Support Equal Rights  


Posted over 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef

"-Allie-" wrote:

Oh great, now the other bomb happy person on here. And I've called you both that before. Tongue Out Maybe its a boy thing, who knows? Gen is not correct. You don't bomb a country that sits next to you bc they might have bombs that could hurt your counrty. If that was the case, the planet would be gone. There is no law anywhere that says that's ok. They were only in imminent threat in their own minds.


BTW, it was TWO separate attacks. It's called being the agressor not practicing self defense.

True, when you look at it from the perspective of a random country that has a few bombs that only have the potential to do bad, then you're right. However, put those bombs in the hands of a terrorist group. Look at it this way, when we were active in Vietnam, we didn't wait for the Vietnamese to attack us, when we found a stockpile of weapons we had to destroy them, for protection. This is what Israel did. Israel is going on the offensive to protect its people from destruction. Did you also know that our Government supported the airstrikes?

The White House said there would be no official comment on the latest attack, but diplomatic sources and U.S. officials told NBC News that the administration is fully supportive of the airstrikes. -NBC World News

I made sure not to get FOX news so you wouldn't say its a sham.



Posted over 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Posts: 7276

LOL Fox news is not news and you know I know it.

I still disagree, the white house has NO OFFICIAL comment which means NO OFFICIAL comment. You still need proof befor you blow stuff up. Proof. 13 died from one of the attacks.

Edited to say: THATS NOT THE DEFENSIVE. THATS BEING THE AGRESSOR. And the same article you quoted says: It wasn’t clear whether the Israelis alerted the U.S. before the attack. White House officials referred all questions to the Israelis. -  They are obviously wanting to stay out of it but Israel got no permission from higher authorities before hand. Ya know, like allies. *scoff*

And why would you bring up something that happened in a WAR? Doesn't even apply.

Potato

I Support Equal Rights  


Posted over 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef

"AlphaT" wrote:



"-Allie-" wrote:


The US could have bombed Syria instead of Israel is what I'm trying to point out. But they didn't and they wouldn't on the info they have now.  smile


But the U.S. is not of such an imminent threat. We also have neutrality laws. "Don't fire until fired upon" is a general rule of thumb. Sorry but...gen.e is right. Israel did what they had to do in order to protect itself from imminent threat.





Thank You Alpha i believe EVERY Nation has the right for self defense  Syria has the right to bomb Israel and Israel has the right to finishing leveling off Syria.

Biblical Resurcher,Rabbi


Posted over 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Posts: 7276

"gen.e1234" wrote:

Thank you Alpha i believe EVERY Nation has the right for self defense  Syria has the right to bomb Israel and Israel has the right to finishing leveling off Syria.
 

Number one: That was NOT self defense. It was agression. They fired without being fired upon and Number two: Israel does not have the right to level off any country or bomb any country they feel like. When exactly did Syria BOMB Isreal? I think not.  With that kind of thinking, we could too. So could NK.

Potato

I Support Equal Rights  


Posted over 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Posts: 440



"AlphaT" wrote:






"-Allie-" wrote:




The US could have bombed Syria instead of Israel is what I'm trying to point out. But they didn't and they wouldn't on the info they have now.  smile


But the U.S. is not of such an imminent threat. We also have neutrality laws. "Don't fire until fired upon" is a general rule of thumb. Sorry but...gen.e is right. Israel did what they had to do in order to protect itself from imminent threat.

 



. "Don't fire until fired upon" is a general rule of thumb.


And yet, here is Israel, firing yet not being fired upon and using pre-emptive strikes. What a remarkable development. Can't wait to see what you have in store to weasel out of this one. It'll probably be something along the lines of "No no, just the US has those laws, not Israel!" which permits Israel to be the aggressor, like in this conflict, which you're both justifying as legitimate. I'm really really excited

I am a furry little kitty. =^.^=


News Feed

To view your full News Feed please Login using your Username and Password or Register with Kidzworld!

Forum Activity

Sillyvision next Generation... in General Roleplays posted by Tord_Trash
Sillyvision next Generation... in General Roleplays posted by Shadeleaf
Sillyvision next Generation... in General Roleplays posted by Tord_Trash
Sillyvision next Generation... in General Roleplays posted by Shadeleaf
Sillyvision next Generation... in General Roleplays posted by Shadeleaf
Sillyvision next Generation... in General Roleplays posted by Tord_Trash
Sillyvision next Generation... in General Roleplays posted by Tord_Trash
Sillyvision next Generation... in General Roleplays posted by Shadeleaf
Sillyvision next Generation... in General Roleplays posted by Tord_Trash
Favourite Gaming YouTube Ch... in Forum Games posted by rainbowpoptart
Sillyvision next Generation... in General Roleplays posted by Tord_Trash
Are You Like Lady Gaga? in Celebs posted by aasih
Home For the Strange ( for ... in Private Roleplay posted by ThisNameWasStolen
Role play anyone? Open one ... in General Roleplays posted by Carters
See you... **NOT CLICKBAIT** in Random posted by XxRuby_PhoenixxX
Would u date the person abo... in Random posted by dragongirl555
♥A Miraculous Child♥ ATJ ♥... in General Roleplays posted by aasih
type whatever comes 2 your ... in Forum Games posted by Abbergrl
Fragments [Violet] | [Uni, ... in Private Roleplay posted by Phantom_Queen
New Real Time Private Messa... in New Features on KW posted by ajcj
what do you want to be when... in Current Events posted by ajcj
what do you want to be when... in Current Events posted by ajcj
NORTH KOREA!!! in Current Events posted by ajcj
New Real Time Private Messa... in New Features on KW posted by ajcj
New Real Time Private Messa... in New Features on KW posted by ajcj
New Real Time Private Messa... in New Features on KW posted by ajcj
New Real Time Private Messa... in New Features on KW posted by ajcj
New site layout this week! in New Features on KW posted by slurpie3
New site layout this week! in New Features on KW posted by James
New site layout this week! in New Features on KW posted by SnowflakeAngelKitten
why are girls so girly in Debating posted by simran88
Would u date the person abo... in Random posted by Nightmare_is_me
Would u date the person abo... in Random posted by DallasCowboy
Would u date the person abo... in Random posted by Abbergrl
Would u date the person abo... in Random posted by FlutePlayer197
Would you happen to have th... in Say Anything posted by MechaMaiden23
Choose a word to describe y... in Random posted by MechaMaiden23
Would u date the person abo... in Random posted by dragongirl555
See you... **NOT CLICKBAIT** in Random posted by ImagineOrdinary
See you... **NOT CLICKBAIT** in Random posted by rainbowpoptart