x

Meet New Friends!

Recommended friends are based on your interests. Make sure they are up to date.

Friends ff8c072dd79a91c1300f032d674241a8d64367100ffb1f25fa3f9bec4a05319f
Kidzworld Logo

Politics and Religion

Chinese one-child policy?

← Previous 1 3 4 5
Posted By:
Turtle52
Turtle52
Member since:
February 2013
Status:
Offline

Posts: 1839
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 3 years ago
What do u think of the Chinese method of population control, only allowing one child per couple?


I Support Equal Rights


Posted By:
shae508
shae508
Member since:
January 2012
Status:
Offline

Posts: 9211
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 3 years ago
I think its wrong. Because if you have more then 1 kid then you have to get rid of it even if it was on accident. Some people even try to kill their children since they cant keep them. If they could have more then 1 then they wouldn't do that. 

Being normal is so boring~
Why not be insane instead?
Devil

6000th post 9/16/2014 6:13 PM Big Grin
8888th post 3/27/2015 (For you huge! Big Grin)


Posted By:
Team Audi #46_1798243 Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Team Audi #46_1798243
Member since:
May 2011
Status:
Offline

Posts: 6883
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 3 years ago
I actually think it's a smart idea. Think about. The world is over-populated as it is. Why should we add more to it? Only child means that our population would hold a relatively steady rate. Some ways it would go down is if, people die without having a child, something happens to the child, or if a massacre or a genocide happens. But the latter is pretty rare to happen.

6000th Post Achieved!
Date: March 2nd 2015
Time: 4:41 PM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|| If you would like to do a PRP with me, send me a comment. I'm always open. ||


Posted By:
prettypinkpony27
prettypinkpony27
Member since:
January 2013
Status:
Offline

Posts: 36
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 3 years ago
Idk it's probably for the best

Haitian Princess


Posted By:
shae508
shae508
Member since:
January 2012
Status:
Offline

Posts: 9211
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 3 years ago

"Team Audi #46" wrote:

I actually think it's a smart idea. Think about. The world is over-populated as it is. Why should we add more to it? Only child means that our population would hold a relatively steady rate. Some ways it would go down is if, people die without having a child, something happens to the child, or if a massacre or a genocide happens. But the latter is pretty rare to happen.


But what if someone had a kid then had another? then they would have to give the kid up.
they should at least be allowed to have a kid if they have them on accident. 

Being normal is so boring~
Why not be insane instead?
Devil

6000th post 9/16/2014 6:13 PM Big Grin
8888th post 3/27/2015 (For you huge! Big Grin)


Posted By:
Team Audi #46_1798243 Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Team Audi #46_1798243
Member since:
May 2011
Status:
Offline

Posts: 6883
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 3 years ago

"shae508" wrote:



"Team Audi #46" wrote:


I actually think it's a smart idea. Think about. The world is over-populated as it is. Why should we add more to it? Only child means that our population would hold a relatively steady rate. Some ways it would go down is if, people die without having a child, something happens to the child, or if a massacre or a genocide happens. But the latter is pretty rare to happen.


But what if someone had a kid then had another? then they would have to give the kid up.
they should at least be allowed to have a kid if they have them on accident. 

That's life. Crap happens. They are trying to keep their population on a limit. Can't blame them. If they accidentally have a child, than that child has to be "taken care" of. Crap happens.

6000th Post Achieved!
Date: March 2nd 2015
Time: 4:41 PM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|| If you would like to do a PRP with me, send me a comment. I'm always open. ||


Posted By:
shae508
shae508
Member since:
January 2012
Status:
Offline

Posts: 9211
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 3 years ago

"Team Audi #46" wrote:



"shae508" wrote:






"Team Audi #46" wrote:




I actually think it's a smart idea. Think about. The world is over-populated as it is. Why should we add more to it? Only child means that our population would hold a relatively steady rate. Some ways it would go down is if, people die without having a child, something happens to the child, or if a massacre or a genocide happens. But the latter is pretty rare to happen.


But what if someone had a kid then had another? then they would have to give the kid up.
they should at least be allowed to have a kid if they have them on accident. 

That's life. Crap happens. They are trying to keep their population on a limit. Can't blame them. If they accidentally have a child, than that child has to be "taken care" of. Crap happens.


And sometimes " taken care of " means killed. Parents have KILLED their kids be because of this law. At least send them to relatives so they can still see their own kid.

Being normal is so boring~
Why not be insane instead?
Devil

6000th post 9/16/2014 6:13 PM Big Grin
8888th post 3/27/2015 (For you huge! Big Grin)


Posted By:
Team Audi #46_1798243 Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Team Audi #46_1798243
Member since:
May 2011
Status:
Offline

Posts: 6883
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 3 years ago

"shae508" wrote:



"Team Audi #46" wrote:






"shae508" wrote:









"Team Audi #46" wrote:






I actually think it's a smart idea. Think about. The world is over-populated as it is. Why should we add more to it? Only child means that our population would hold a relatively steady rate. Some ways it would go down is if, people die without having a child, something happens to the child, or if a massacre or a genocide happens. But the latter is pretty rare to happen.


But what if someone had a kid then had another? then they would have to give the kid up.
they should at least be allowed to have a kid if they have them on accident. 

That's life. Crap happens. They are trying to keep their population on a limit. Can't blame them. If they accidentally have a child, than that child has to be "taken care" of. Crap happens.


And sometimes " taken care of " means killed. Parents have KILLED their kids be because of this law. At least send them to relatives so they can still see their own kid.

I agree with you on that. That is taking it a little too far. I believe the child has a right to live.

6000th Post Achieved!
Date: March 2nd 2015
Time: 4:41 PM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|| If you would like to do a PRP with me, send me a comment. I'm always open. ||


Posted By:
shae508
shae508
Member since:
January 2012
Status:
Offline

Posts: 9211
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 3 years ago

"Team Audi #46" wrote:



"shae508" wrote:






"Team Audi #46" wrote:









"shae508" wrote:












"Team Audi #46" wrote:








I actually think it's a smart idea. Think about. The world is over-populated as it is. Why should we add more to it? Only child means that our population would hold a relatively steady rate. Some ways it would go down is if, people die without having a child, something happens to the child, or if a massacre or a genocide happens. But the latter is pretty rare to happen.


But what if someone had a kid then had another? then they would have to give the kid up.
they should at least be allowed to have a kid if they have them on accident. 

That's life. Crap happens. They are trying to keep their population on a limit. Can't blame them. If they accidentally have a child, than that child has to be "taken care" of. Crap happens.


And sometimes " taken care of " means killed. Parents have KILLED their kids be because of this law. At least send them to relatives so they can still see their own kid.

I agree with you on that. That is taking it a little too far. I believe the child has a right to live.



Exactly. If they didn't have the law they wouldn't kill their kid. simple. Whats the punishment for breaking that law anyway?

Being normal is so boring~
Why not be insane instead?
Devil

6000th post 9/16/2014 6:13 PM Big Grin
8888th post 3/27/2015 (For you huge! Big Grin)


Posted By:
Team Audi #46_1798243 Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Team Audi #46_1798243
Member since:
May 2011
Status:
Offline

Posts: 6883
Star 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1eStar 771721baa52164faab3e80914eb3e8e418513288f39d7ccffd0d5c4f8d045d1e
Posted over 3 years ago

"shae508" wrote:



"Team Audi #46" wrote:






"shae508" wrote:









"Team Audi #46" wrote:












"shae508" wrote:















"Team Audi #46" wrote:










I actually think it's a smart idea. Think about. The world is over-populated as it is. Why should we add more to it? Only child means that our population would hold a relatively steady rate. Some ways it would go down is if, people die without having a child, something happens to the child, or if a massacre or a genocide happens. But the latter is pretty rare to happen.


But what if someone had a kid then had another? then they would have to give the kid up.
they should at least be allowed to have a kid if they have them on accident. 

That's life. Crap happens. They are trying to keep their population on a limit. Can't blame them. If they accidentally have a child, than that child has to be "taken care" of. Crap happens.


And sometimes " taken care of " means killed. Parents have KILLED their kids be because of this law. At least send them to relatives so they can still see their own kid.

I agree with you on that. That is taking it a little too far. I believe the child has a right to live.



Exactly. If they didn't have the law they wouldn't kill their kid. simple. Whats the punishment for breaking that law anyway?

I have no clue. I'm imagining nothing good.

6000th Post Achieved!
Date: March 2nd 2015
Time: 4:41 PM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|| If you would like to do a PRP with me, send me a comment. I'm always open. ||


← Previous 1 3 4 5

Latest Forum Posts

The kW smart guess game ;)

The kW smart guess game ;)

The kW smart guess game ;)

The kW smart guess game ;)

The kW smart guess game ;)

The kW smart guess game ;)

The kW smart guess game ;)

The kW smart guess game ;)

The kW smart guess game ;)

The kW smart guess game ;)

Latest Videos

Play Online Games