Back left 2f43f253cf82f12a36d1f519b3672143798f55731787ab30a5ff23d1b75b4811
Back right eb032ac36c88e9da99b231a2366bd9dc4a2dc908b7b826bd3fb939bd94a1baa3
Posted about 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Member since:
February 2013
Posts: 1839

What do u think of the Chinese method of population control, only allowing one child per couple?


I Support Equal Rights


Posted about 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Member since:
January 2012
Posts: 9211

I think its wrong. Because if you have more then 1 kid then you have to get rid of it even if it was on accident. Some people even try to kill their children since they cant keep them. If they could have more then 1 then they wouldn't do that. 

Being normal is so boring~
Why not be insane instead?
Devil

6000th post 9/16/2014 6:13 PM Big Grin
8888th post 3/27/2015 (For you huge! Big Grin)


Posted about 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Member since:
May 2011
Posts: 6883

I actually think it's a smart idea. Think about. The world is over-populated as it is. Why should we add more to it? Only child means that our population would hold a relatively steady rate. Some ways it would go down is if, people die without having a child, something happens to the child, or if a massacre or a genocide happens. But the latter is pretty rare to happen.

6000th Post Achieved!
Date: March 2nd 2015
Time: 4:41 PM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|| If you would like to do a PRP with me, send me a comment. I'm always open. ||


Posted about 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Member since:
January 2013
Posts: 36

Idk it's probably for the best

Haitian Princess


Posted about 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Member since:
January 2012
Posts: 9211

"Team Audi #46" wrote:

I actually think it's a smart idea. Think about. The world is over-populated as it is. Why should we add more to it? Only child means that our population would hold a relatively steady rate. Some ways it would go down is if, people die without having a child, something happens to the child, or if a massacre or a genocide happens. But the latter is pretty rare to happen.


But what if someone had a kid then had another? then they would have to give the kid up.
they should at least be allowed to have a kid if they have them on accident. 

Being normal is so boring~
Why not be insane instead?
Devil

6000th post 9/16/2014 6:13 PM Big Grin
8888th post 3/27/2015 (For you huge! Big Grin)


Posted about 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Member since:
May 2011
Posts: 6883

"shae508" wrote:



"Team Audi #46" wrote:


I actually think it's a smart idea. Think about. The world is over-populated as it is. Why should we add more to it? Only child means that our population would hold a relatively steady rate. Some ways it would go down is if, people die without having a child, something happens to the child, or if a massacre or a genocide happens. But the latter is pretty rare to happen.


But what if someone had a kid then had another? then they would have to give the kid up.
they should at least be allowed to have a kid if they have them on accident. 

That's life. Crap happens. They are trying to keep their population on a limit. Can't blame them. If they accidentally have a child, than that child has to be "taken care" of. Crap happens.

6000th Post Achieved!
Date: March 2nd 2015
Time: 4:41 PM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|| If you would like to do a PRP with me, send me a comment. I'm always open. ||


Posted about 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Member since:
January 2012
Posts: 9211

"Team Audi #46" wrote:



"shae508" wrote:






"Team Audi #46" wrote:




I actually think it's a smart idea. Think about. The world is over-populated as it is. Why should we add more to it? Only child means that our population would hold a relatively steady rate. Some ways it would go down is if, people die without having a child, something happens to the child, or if a massacre or a genocide happens. But the latter is pretty rare to happen.


But what if someone had a kid then had another? then they would have to give the kid up.
they should at least be allowed to have a kid if they have them on accident. 

That's life. Crap happens. They are trying to keep their population on a limit. Can't blame them. If they accidentally have a child, than that child has to be "taken care" of. Crap happens.


And sometimes " taken care of " means killed. Parents have KILLED their kids be because of this law. At least send them to relatives so they can still see their own kid.

Being normal is so boring~
Why not be insane instead?
Devil

6000th post 9/16/2014 6:13 PM Big Grin
8888th post 3/27/2015 (For you huge! Big Grin)


Posted about 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Member since:
May 2011
Posts: 6883

"shae508" wrote:



"Team Audi #46" wrote:






"shae508" wrote:









"Team Audi #46" wrote:






I actually think it's a smart idea. Think about. The world is over-populated as it is. Why should we add more to it? Only child means that our population would hold a relatively steady rate. Some ways it would go down is if, people die without having a child, something happens to the child, or if a massacre or a genocide happens. But the latter is pretty rare to happen.


But what if someone had a kid then had another? then they would have to give the kid up.
they should at least be allowed to have a kid if they have them on accident. 

That's life. Crap happens. They are trying to keep their population on a limit. Can't blame them. If they accidentally have a child, than that child has to be "taken care" of. Crap happens.


And sometimes " taken care of " means killed. Parents have KILLED their kids be because of this law. At least send them to relatives so they can still see their own kid.

I agree with you on that. That is taking it a little too far. I believe the child has a right to live.

6000th Post Achieved!
Date: March 2nd 2015
Time: 4:41 PM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|| If you would like to do a PRP with me, send me a comment. I'm always open. ||


Posted about 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Member since:
January 2012
Posts: 9211

"Team Audi #46" wrote:



"shae508" wrote:






"Team Audi #46" wrote:









"shae508" wrote:












"Team Audi #46" wrote:








I actually think it's a smart idea. Think about. The world is over-populated as it is. Why should we add more to it? Only child means that our population would hold a relatively steady rate. Some ways it would go down is if, people die without having a child, something happens to the child, or if a massacre or a genocide happens. But the latter is pretty rare to happen.


But what if someone had a kid then had another? then they would have to give the kid up.
they should at least be allowed to have a kid if they have them on accident. 

That's life. Crap happens. They are trying to keep their population on a limit. Can't blame them. If they accidentally have a child, than that child has to be "taken care" of. Crap happens.


And sometimes " taken care of " means killed. Parents have KILLED their kids be because of this law. At least send them to relatives so they can still see their own kid.

I agree with you on that. That is taking it a little too far. I believe the child has a right to live.



Exactly. If they didn't have the law they wouldn't kill their kid. simple. Whats the punishment for breaking that law anyway?

Being normal is so boring~
Why not be insane instead?
Devil

6000th post 9/16/2014 6:13 PM Big Grin
8888th post 3/27/2015 (For you huge! Big Grin)


Posted about 4 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Member since:
May 2011
Posts: 6883

"shae508" wrote:



"Team Audi #46" wrote:






"shae508" wrote:









"Team Audi #46" wrote:












"shae508" wrote:















"Team Audi #46" wrote:










I actually think it's a smart idea. Think about. The world is over-populated as it is. Why should we add more to it? Only child means that our population would hold a relatively steady rate. Some ways it would go down is if, people die without having a child, something happens to the child, or if a massacre or a genocide happens. But the latter is pretty rare to happen.


But what if someone had a kid then had another? then they would have to give the kid up.
they should at least be allowed to have a kid if they have them on accident. 

That's life. Crap happens. They are trying to keep their population on a limit. Can't blame them. If they accidentally have a child, than that child has to be "taken care" of. Crap happens.


And sometimes " taken care of " means killed. Parents have KILLED their kids be because of this law. At least send them to relatives so they can still see their own kid.

I agree with you on that. That is taking it a little too far. I believe the child has a right to live.



Exactly. If they didn't have the law they wouldn't kill their kid. simple. Whats the punishment for breaking that law anyway?

I have no clue. I'm imagining nothing good.

6000th Post Achieved!
Date: March 2nd 2015
Time: 4:41 PM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|| If you would like to do a PRP with me, send me a comment. I'm always open. ||


News Feed

To view full News Feed please Login using your Username and Password or Register with Kidzworld!

Forum Activity

- 2017-11-21 19:50:23 -0800

- 2017-11-21 13:23:28 -0800

- 2017-11-21 13:14:26 -0800

- 2017-11-21 13:09:48 -0800

- 2017-11-21 13:09:13 -0800

- 2017-11-21 13:03:48 -0800

- 2017-11-21 12:54:38 -0800

- 2017-11-21 12:51:51 -0800

- 2017-11-21 12:12:56 -0800

- 2017-11-21 11:52:48 -0800

- 2017-11-19 13:38:51 -0800

- 2017-11-19 22:42:55 -0800

- 2017-11-19 12:44:05 -0800

- 2017-11-19 16:34:51 -0800

- 2017-11-19 14:42:22 -0800

- 2017-11-19 18:40:51 -0800

- 2017-11-20 00:07:46 -0800

- 2017-11-20 16:20:29 -0800

- 2017-11-19 16:37:32 -0800

- 2017-11-20 02:17:42 -0800

- 2017-11-20 20:14:47 -0800

- 2017-11-20 18:22:33 -0800

- 2017-11-20 16:46:55 -0800

- 2017-11-20 14:59:19 -0800

- 2017-11-17 16:29:09 -0800

- 2017-11-17 14:11:18 -0800

- 2017-11-17 13:02:36 -0800

- 2017-11-14 20:48:33 -0800

- 2017-11-14 20:19:10 -0800

- 2017-11-14 20:17:20 -0800

- 2017-11-21 13:03:48 -0800

- 2017-11-21 12:54:38 -0800

- 2017-11-21 12:12:56 -0800

- 2017-11-21 10:05:58 -0800

- 2017-11-21 08:32:08 -0800

- 2017-11-21 08:24:25 -0800

- 2017-11-21 06:11:24 -0800

- 2017-11-21 03:53:08 -0800

- 2017-11-21 01:13:57 -0800

- 2017-11-21 01:03:44 -0800