"onlyindarkness" wrote:
^^
Regarding the above claim; this is not written by me, but on another online source I found.
No, Chick-Fil-A Did Not Support Legislation To Kill Gays
by: Dana Loesch
Due to a lack of reading comprehension and desire to deal in truth, progressive websites have for days peddled the lie that Chick-Fil-A supported the Family Research Council's support of legislation which OK'd gay-killing in Uganda. A lie that took all of two seconds to debunk:
The Tony Perkins-led FRC said it did lobby on the bill, but not to kill it – rather to change the language it contained and to remove sweeping and inaccurate assertions that homosexual conduct is internationally recognized as a fundamental human right.
FRC did not lobby against or oppose passage of the congressional resolution. FRC's efforts, at the request of Congressional offices, were limited to seeking changes in the language of proposed drafts of the resolution, in order to make it more factually accurate regarding the content of the Uganda bill.
FRC does not support the Uganda bill, and does not support the death penalty for homosexuality - nor any other penalty which would have the effect of inhibiting compassionate pastoral, psychological, and medical care and treatment for those who experience same-gender attractions or who engage in homosexual conduct.What? So you mean the story about Chick-Fil-A supporting gay-killing is complete and utter hogwash? Of course it is. Do you expect any of the many websites to print retractions? No, you don't.
Unless you've stopped buying gas from OPEC countries which oppose even the discussion of gays and condone death as punishment -- and you didn't vote for the party that endorsed the gay-killing Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt -- shush.
You're well aware of how something being written online doesn't make it true. What organization upon being suspected of lobbying something so horrendous would admit to it? FRC claims that it was lobbying for something else. Does that mean it's telling the truth? Lobbying itself is a shady business.
The FRC interested in accuracy?
They're known for creating propaganda, especially false links between gay men and "having attraction to children," the actual word will get caught in the filter.
Interested in "compassionate pastoral, psychological, and medical care and treatment for those who experience same-gender attractions?!" The American Psychological Association has said that any attempts at changing someone's sexuality is harmful. There is nothing compassionate about it.
"A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in." -Greek proverb
Because of school, I don't have much time to be on KW atm.