-
x

Meet New Friends!

Recommended friends are based on your interests. Make sure they are up to date.

Friends
Kidzworld Logo

Here Lies Arthur Book Review

Here Lies Arthur Book Review - Reviewed by Kidzworld on Mar 31, 2010
( Rating: 4 Star Rating)

Philip Reeve, author of the Larklight trilogy, weaves a new tale of the legendary King Arthur. Check out Kidzworld’s book review and summary of Here Lies Arthur.

Title: Here Lies Arthur Author: Philip Reeve
Ages: 12+
Rating: 4


Philip Reeve, author of the Larklight trilogy, weaves a new tale of the legendary King Arthur. Check out Kidzworld’s book review and summary of Here Lies Arthur.


Transformation

When Gwyna’s village is destroyed by King Arthur and his kinsmen, she’s forced to flee. Myrddin, Arthur’s bard and storyteller, finds her and offers her a job to join their traveling war-band as Myrddin’s apprentice. There’s only one problem: Gwyna is a girl. Somehow she must fool Arthur and his men into believing she’s a boy. But there’s more to being a boy that cutting her hair and wearing pants. Gwyna must learn the rough-and-tough mannerisms that the other boys possess.


A Fading Disguise

During her years as “Gwyn,” Gwyna learns to enjoy her life as a boy. But as the years pass, it becomes harder for Gwyna disguise herself. She’s not growing facial hair, her voice isn’t deepening, and she starts to develop womanly features. Soon, Myrddin is forced to end the charade. He sends Gwyna away where she can learn what it means to be a woman once again.


Missing Boyhood

But Gwyna isn’t happy. She misses the freedom of boyhood. She misses her friend Bedwyn and her horse Dewi. And most of all, she misses Myrddin.


The Bottom Line

Here Lies Arthur by Philip Reeve is a wonderful story that shows the legendary King Arthur in a more realistic light. He’s only human, after all. According to this novel, all his feats and conquests were merely stories spun by Arthur’s very own bard, Myrddin. From Gwyna’s disguises to Arthur’s triumphs, Here Lies Arthur shows how, with the right words, people will believe whatever they are assured is true.
Tell us what you think of Here Lies Arthur in our comments section below!


Related Stories:

  • Fever Crumb Book Review
  • The Chestnut King Book Review
  • The Keys to the Kingdom: Superior Saturday Book Review
  • King Arthur's Court

  • 1 Comment

    Related Stories

    Delve into the legend of King Arthur, battle with the Knights of the Round Table and build the ma...
    Play through the adventure of the movie, or raise a pet mul-mul, in this mini-ga...
    Get ready for jousting, fierce battles and beautiful maidens. Nope, it's not A Knight's Tale. It'...
    F1019519918796

    Books vs. Flicks - Which Do You Like?

    • I always watch the movie, I never read the book.
    • I read the book but don't watch the flick - it's never as good.
    • I watch the movie and read the book.

    Random In The Forums

    -Gwen9--
    -Gwen9-- posted in Debating:
    "AlphaT" wrote: "donteatcarrots" wrote:​no. it's mainly the people who are given the guns that need to be properly checked. the guy who killed 49 people in orlando had mental health problems and trouble with the fbi was still given a gun. this doesn't make sense at all to me. yeah he probably has knives and stuff at home which could do just as much harm- so is the gun necessary in the first place? No one is given a gun. A person has to acquire a permit, and then has to buy a gun for themselves.  Okay, yes, mental health is an obvious issue. But it needs to be for specific mental health problems. It can't be just because someone has a mental illness, because many mental illnesses won't effect the operation and use of a gun, or make it more likely for a person to hurt someone else with a gun. I support background checks which would include mental health history, but only if it's done right. Similarly, the guy who killed 49 people in Orlando was taken off the FBI watchlist. This tells me that there are flaws with the way that the watchlist is currently being used. Once that system is redone, then we can restrict those on it from buying firearms. But at its' current success rate? Not a chance.  And it's not about what's necessary...well to an extent it is, but hear me out. Weapons are used for self defense. No matter how many gun laws you have, criminals will still use firearms in their crimes. Citizens require at least an equal amount of protection that criminals use to break the law.  In other words, if you were to be the victim of gun violence, would you rather have with you a knife or a gun? Would you honestly bring a knife to a gun fight?  First of all, I agree with you. Mental health is definitely an issue! But together these issues can be addressed!!!! And as I said earlier, we can control our weapons. The government can create a harder way to get a gun or any weapon. Look at criminal records!!!! Even before getting a permit, or a license, CHECK THE RECORDS!!! This will help prevent these mass shootings.
    reply about 2 hours
    Hoellu
    Hoellu posted in Debating:
    "-Gwen9--" wrote:The second amendmant in the United States Constitution is the right to bare arms. If they take away our weapons, then they take away the second amendmant. The amendmant is there for a reason. Weapons are useful for protection. Protection is going to keep us alive. The human population, as a nation, and as a world! If we take away our weapons now we are all dead! We don't want that.  Now, killing 50 people in the Orlando shooting. That is just not right at all. It was not the gun's fault, it was the person. Same thing with the death of Christina Grimmie. Now, I personally believe that we should not take guns away, but we should find a harder process into buying a gun or some other weapon, and we should be trained properly! Look at people's criminal records, look at their other records. I don't care! As long as we still have protection, but less mass shootings! Omg, so true.
    reply about 2 hours
    AdeleQxeen
    AdeleQxeen posted in Electronics:
    I have one. I got it for my birthday last year, it's a Samsung Core Prime.
    reply about 2 hours
    Hoellu
    Hoellu posted in Debating:
    If there are polices, why are there weapons for almost anyone?Or at least they should have an special permission.
    reply about 2 hours
    AlphaT
    AlphaT posted in Debating:
    "donteatcarrots" wrote:​no. it's mainly the people who are given the guns that need to be properly checked. the guy who killed 49 people in orlando had mental health problems and trouble with the fbi was still given a gun. this doesn't make sense at all to me. yeah he probably has knives and stuff at home which could do just as much harm- so is the gun necessary in the first place? No one is given a gun. A person has to acquire a permit, and then has to buy a gun for themselves.  Okay, yes, mental health is an obvious issue. But it needs to be for specific mental health problems. It can't be just because someone has a mental illness, because many mental illnesses won't effect the operation and use of a gun, or make it more likely for a person to hurt someone else with a gun. I support background checks which would include mental health history, but only if it's done right. Similarly, the guy who killed 49 people in Orlando was taken off the FBI watchlist. This tells me that there are flaws with the way that the watchlist is currently being used. Once that system is redone, then we can restrict those on it from buying firearms. But at its' current success rate? Not a chance.  And it's not about what's necessary...well to an extent it is, but hear me out. Weapons are used for self defense. No matter how many gun laws you have, criminals will still use firearms in their crimes. Citizens require at least an equal amount of protection that criminals use to break the law.  In other words, if you were to be the victim of gun violence, would you rather have with you a knife or a gun? Would you honestly bring a knife to a gun fight? 
    reply about 2 hours