Kw-logo-smaller

Fray #3 Comic Review

Fray #3 Comic Review - Reviewed by Kidzworld on Dec 27, 2006
( Rating: 3 Star Rating)

I am liking the look of Fray a bit more than I did. Fray #3 belongs to Urkonn the goat guy, as he spins a tale of slayers' past and lets our little reluctant duster in on the history.

Author: Joss Whedon

Fray #3 belongs to Urkonn the goat guy, as he spins a tale of slayers past and lets our little reluctant duster in on the history of those nasty lurks. And in the tellin' spills that he isn't actually Melaka's Watcher and that all the real Watchmen have gone bonkers from sitting around waiting for baddies. And just when I think, ya like I know the feeling, I smell that other Nike and something tells me its about to drop as Mel finally comes face to with Icarus.


The Bottom line

I must admit I am liking the look of Fray a bit more than I did. And yes, I know that skinny books are more about splatter than patter but try to imagine Angel with out the Cordy comebacks or Buffy sans the scooby gang. Without the gang these chosen ones are just chicks with sharp sticks. All muscle, no chuckle. I hope, soon, Fray learns to play nice with others so that along with the hijinx, come witty-isms. 'Nuff of the Ready, Steady... I really, really pray #4 is a GO!


Fray #3 Rating:3


Related Stories:

  • Quiz! Test Your Superhero Know-How!
  • Fray #1 Comic Review
  • Uncanny X-Men # 385 :: The Shell Game Comic Review
  • X2 Movie Review
  • 0 Comments

    latest videos

    F1115402633390

    Best Batman Villain? Vote!

    • The Joker.
    • Mr. Freeze.
    • The Penguin.
    • The Riddler.

    related stories

    I truly believe that Joss Whedon can walk on water. He brings truth and life to the words that hi...

    Random in the forums

    Boysrock50
    Boysrock50 posted in Debating:
    "-Karpov-" wrote: "Boysrock50" wrote: I think animal testing is only acceptable if it is really necessary and if it's going to benefit us. I can't really object to it as I don't know a better alternative to testing it's safety before human trials. If it's likely to cause more pain than gain then there's no point doing it just 'to make sure'. As it is now do you think it's ok to continue doing it?   I'm not sure how it is done right now, give me some time to read about it, not really a topic I've bothered about before. All you tend to hear is protests against how horrible it is, but people seem to be fine with it on a whole tbh >>hmm it's unpleasant but I think most of it is necessary. I would say it's acceptable at the moment but we should try to find alternatives, e.g. testing on lab-grown tissues. And only test on animals for the things that have no alternatives
    reply 17 minutes
    -Karpov-
    -Karpov- posted in Debating:
    "Boysrock50" wrote:I think animal testing is only acceptable if it is really necessary and if it's going to benefit us. I can't really object to it as I don't know a better alternative to testing it's safety before human trials. If it's likely to cause more pain than gain then there's no point doing it just 'to make sure'. As it is now do you think it's ok to continue doing it?  
    reply 19 minutes
    Armygirlfriend
    North America. 
    reply 21 minutes
    Armygirlfriend
    When you truly love someone, no distance or amount of time can tear you apart. Sure it would be easier to move on, but being with anyone else would just be settling. The days are lonely and the nights are worse but when you have a love this strong never let it go. It may be hard, but God knows it'll be worth in the end. It's my favorite quote because I'm dating a soldier. I live in the state and town we met in but we've been together for four months and he's away at bootcamp right now but I love him. And this quote truly speaks about what we're going through. 
    reply 23 minutes
    Boysrock50
    Boysrock50 posted in Debating:
    I think animal testing is only acceptable if it is really necessary and if it's going to benefit us. I can't really object to it as I don't know a better alternative to testing it's safety before human trials. If it's likely to cause more pain than gain then there's no point doing it just 'to make sure'.
    reply 30 minutes

    play online games