"rainbowpoptart" wrote:Neither Clinton nor Obama can rid of our rights to guns. It's against the second amendment, and a terrible thing to do overall for reasons that probably don't need explaining.However, we do need to monitor who we do and don't give weapons to. As you said, it's not the gun that harms others. It's the people.
You're talking about the person who threatened to cut off the funding of an entire state of our nation based on his interpretation of the constitution. The person who has bypassed the Republican controlled Congress on issues of immigration and healthcare. While Obama couldn't mess with the second amendment, he has the authority to pass heavy restrictions based on interpretation.
Honestly, this is why I support ratifying the second amendment. The term " well regulated militia" is far too narrow in this age of bureaucracy.
"simran88" wrote:Some people buy the gun with the intention of hurting people. Weapon control is going to help reduce the wrong people having an access to owning a gun. If someone has the intention of hurting people, do you think that gun laws will stop them? You said it yourself, they already intend to break the law by hurting others.
I am sad because my best friend graduated yesterday.
about 1 hour