Kw-logo-smaller

Bear Care

It’s not just humans who are surviving the deadly bush fires in Australia. Animals of all shapes and sizes are starting to limp, stagger or be carried from the worst-affected fire areas – many of these are being taken in by wildlife shelters across the country.

Among the animal survivors is Bellerine the possum, who was found with third-degree burns on her feet, a young echidna that was suffering smoke inhalation and, perhaps the most famous of them all, Sam the koala bear, who was saved by firefighter David Tree who stopped to give her a drink from his water bottle while he was out fighting the devastating fires.

Pictures of Sam traveled quickly through cyberspace and were featured in major newspapers and news shows around the world. Sam, who is recovering in Mountain Ash Wildlife Shelter, suffered burns on her paws and was in a lot of pain, but is on the road to recovery.


David Tree said he was in the middle of backburning when he saw Sam. “I could see she had sore feet and was in trouble, so I pulled over the fire truck. She just plonked herself down, as if to say ‘I'm beat.’ I offered her a drink and she drank three bottles. The most amazing part was when she grabbed my hand. I will never forget that.”


Related articles:

  • Heat Wave
  • Bush Fire
  • Volunteer Fireman Rob Ross
  • Protecting Our Forests From Fire
  • 1 Comment

    latest videos

    F1078872203171

    Name Your Fave Aussie!

    • Kylie Minogue.
    • Heath Ledger.
    • Nicole Kidman.
    • Russell Crowe.

    related stories

    Random in the forums

    Boysrock50
    Boysrock50 posted in Debating:
    "-Karpov-" wrote: "Boysrock50" wrote: I think animal testing is only acceptable if it is really necessary and if it's going to benefit us. I can't really object to it as I don't know a better alternative to testing it's safety before human trials. If it's likely to cause more pain than gain then there's no point doing it just 'to make sure'. As it is now do you think it's ok to continue doing it?   I'm not sure how it is done right now, give me some time to read about it, not really a topic I've bothered about before. All you tend to hear is protests against how horrible it is, but people seem to be fine with it on a whole tbh >>hmm it's unpleasant but I think most of it is necessary. I would say it's acceptable at the moment but we should try to find alternatives, e.g. testing on lab-grown tissues. And only test on animals for the things that have no alternatives
    reply 17 minutes
    -Karpov-
    -Karpov- posted in Debating:
    "Boysrock50" wrote:I think animal testing is only acceptable if it is really necessary and if it's going to benefit us. I can't really object to it as I don't know a better alternative to testing it's safety before human trials. If it's likely to cause more pain than gain then there's no point doing it just 'to make sure'. As it is now do you think it's ok to continue doing it?  
    reply 19 minutes
    Armygirlfriend
    North America. 
    reply 21 minutes
    Armygirlfriend
    When you truly love someone, no distance or amount of time can tear you apart. Sure it would be easier to move on, but being with anyone else would just be settling. The days are lonely and the nights are worse but when you have a love this strong never let it go. It may be hard, but God knows it'll be worth in the end. It's my favorite quote because I'm dating a soldier. I live in the state and town we met in but we've been together for four months and he's away at bootcamp right now but I love him. And this quote truly speaks about what we're going through. 
    reply 23 minutes
    Boysrock50
    Boysrock50 posted in Debating:
    I think animal testing is only acceptable if it is really necessary and if it's going to benefit us. I can't really object to it as I don't know a better alternative to testing it's safety before human trials. If it's likely to cause more pain than gain then there's no point doing it just 'to make sure'.
    reply 30 minutes

    play online games