Kw-logo-smaller

The Legends of Bigfoot, Sasquatch & the Yeti

There have been recorded Bigfoot sightings for hundreds of years.
Bigfoot
Bigfoot is known as the Sasquatch in Canada.
Sasquatch
The Legends of Bigfoot, Sasquatch & the Yeti - Reviewed by Kidzworld on Dec 27, 2006
( Rating: 1 Star Rating)

There have been sightings of the hairy creatures for hundreds of years, so Kidzworld is taking a look at the legend of Bigfoot, the Sasquatch and the Yeti.

He's tall, he's hairy and you don't want to run into him at night. No, it's not your dad going for a midnight snack. He's known by many unique names, with the ones used most often being Bigfoot, Sasquatch and Yeti. This creature has been a mystery of the woods for hundreds of years. But does he really exist?

Though the name of the beast has changed from place to place, it is clear that all the legends share the same fundamental characteristics. It's known as the Yeti or Abominable Snowman in the Asian mountain range of the Himalayas, Bigfoot in the American Northwest and the Sasquatch in Canada. There have been recorded sightings of this creature all over the world for hundreds of years.

It is said to forage for food at night and sleep during the day. This nocturnal beast stands between seven and eight feet tall and can weigh over 450 lbs. (200 kg.) Most people who have encountered Bigfoot or his counterparts have described the creature as being half-man/half-ape, with dark, long fur all over its body. Of course, no one is ruling out a female Bigfoot. Many people have reported seeing whole Sasquatch families. There have also been Bigfoot and Sasquatch encounters where the hairy creature is described as being all white, and the Himalayan species of Yeti is often said to be white.

The legend of Bigfoot is so popular around the world that there have been several Bigfoot-inspired characters in Hollywood films:

  • Sully from Disney's Monster's Inc. isn't your typical Bigfoot, but he could surely be a distant cousin!
  • Harry from Harry and the Hendersons, a 1987 movie starring Third Rock from the Sun star, John Lithgow.
  • The Fouke Monster of the 1972 documentary-style thriller, The Legend of Boggy Creek.
  • Who could forget the Abominable Snowman from the animated classic Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer?

1 Frist of all, I think that Bigfoot is real. Why else would they know what Bigfoot looked like? I think that Bigfoot is 100% REAL.

Kidz Submit by:

Nickname: bratgirl
Age: 12

1 Of course the "Yeti" is real. Why? Because there is evidence that proves it is real. But I'm confirmed there are different species of Yeti all over the world. And it just might be one of our ancestors, since it's half ape/half human!

Kidz Submit by:

Nickname: Smartest_gurl
Age: 10

1 I don't believe in the legend of Bigfoot. I'm 100% behind my feelings. I mean, do you really think that a big hairy monster is out there? Please!

Kidz Submit by:

Nickname: upbeatbubble8806
Age: 14

1 I so think Big foot is real. I mean there's lots of things that people believe in and they have never seen it/person. So, why is there no such thing as a big foot? Also, how would any one know what big foot looks like? I think big foot is 100% real.

Kidz Submit by:

Nickname: skittles1233
Age: 14

1 I think there is a bigfoot! Hey, there is evidence that bigfoot exists! Evidence like pictures, testimonies and even videos! And you can't say that there's no such thing as a bigfoot because we have not discovered all the creatures here on this big Earth! Am I right or am I right?

Kidz Submit by:

Nickname: earlvincentsombilon
Age: 16

So what do you think? Are there hulking, hairy creatures lurking around our forests late at night? Let us know what you think below!

1Last week's Believe it or Not was about Lake Monsters. No one has ever captured a lake monster, but there have been tons of sightings and even some pics (though they're usually pretty blurry!) Check out what other people though about the lake monster legend.

Do you Believe in Lake Monsters?

Yeah! I even have pics! 37%
No way. There's no such thing as lake monsters 6%
Maybe Nessie is real, but not the others. 31%
No, but I'll be on the lookout for 'em, just in case. 25%

Related Stories:
>
>

readers voted!

Comments

JesseWesse

JesseWesse wrote:

Is it Bigfoot because he has a big foot lol
commented: Tue Apr 15, 2014

doxiluvr18

doxiluvr18 wrote:

I only believe!!!!!!!!!!!! :D
commented: Sat Mar 15, 2014

Shadeleaf

Shadeleaf wrote:

Like Slebnderman, you can't find them. They are just legends and creepy camp fire stor...
commented: Sun Jan 12, 2014

there are 35 more comments

Please login or register to add comments


like this article?
Sign up now to get more just like!

latest videos

F1023907779734

Believe in Bigfoot or Not?

  • Yeah! I'm sure there's a Bigfoot out there.
  • No way. There are definitely no Sasquatches.
  • Well, maybe in Asia, but not in North America.
  • I don't know. I haven't seen one.

related stories

Micro_a micro
It’s time to talk about the Legend of Zombies. Like the Mummy, zombies are a lumbering, staggerin...
Micro_a micro
AROOooooooooh… it’s time to talk about the legend of the werewooooooolf! If your little bratty br...
Micro_legendoftheguardians-micro
Kathryn Lasky’s bestselling YA series comes to life in Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga’Ho...

Random in the forums

AlphaT
AlphaT posted in Debating:
"Teh_Skittlez" wrote: "AlphaT" wrote: "Teh_Skittlez" wrote: I should have known using the confederacy as an example would resonate with you. Like you said, it's another topic, but I could also talk about the Pacific slave trade.  I'm not pro slave, but I am against the south=racist bandwagon. I know you're smart enough to not be on that wagon though. Objection: Relevance? How is Pacific Slave Trade significant to the topic? It affected men and women alike (albeit mostly men)? It's not particularly relevant, it's another topic, that's why I'm not going to talk about it.  Oh. Okay.
reply 6 minutes
Teh_Skittlez
Teh_Skittlez posted in Debating:
"AlphaT" wrote: "Teh_Skittlez" wrote: I should have known using the confederacy as an example would resonate with you. Like you said, it's another topic, but I could also talk about the Pacific slave trade.  I'm not pro slave, but I am against the south=racist bandwagon. I know you're smart enough to not be on that wagon though. Objection: Relevance? How is Pacific Slave Trade significant to the topic? It affected men and women alike (albeit mostly men)? It's not particularly relevant, it's another topic, that's why I'm not going to talk about it. 
reply 7 minutes
AlphaT
AlphaT posted in Debating:
"Teh_Skittlez" wrote:I should have known using the confederacy as an example would resonate with you. Like you said, it's another topic, but I could also talk about the Pacific slave trade.  I'm not pro slave, but I am against the south=racist bandwagon. I know you're smart enough to not be on that wagon though. Objection: Relevance? How is Pacific Slave Trade significant to the topic?
reply 12 minutes
Teh_Skittlez
Teh_Skittlez posted in Debating:
"AlphaT" wrote: "Teh_Skittlez" wrote: "AlphaT" wrote: "Teh_Skittlez" wrote: "AlphaT" wrote: "Teh_Skittlez" wrote: Right, I'm obligated to sign up for the draft, and you couldn't even if you wanted to. Then again, women couldn't own and manage land while married until 1718....and it wasn't national until around 1850. You should probably specify where, because the place where I live wasn't even colonized yet in 1718.  Providence of Pennsylvania. However most states didn't accept it until around 1840-50. Maryland had achieved statehood in 1788, but it took them until 1841 to legalize married women to own property, and even them they had no control over the property. This is the case for many states. Face it, early America treated women as property....she was right on that part. But that's all changed. I'm not denying it. I was merely suggesting that you should specify where. Of course, in all the dates you've listed so far, men were also to be bought and sold as property in the U.S. in the states that would become the Confederacy. I would say that their treatment as property was much harsher than that of women in many cases, but yes, of course both men and women have been treated as property by the law in the past, and still are in many places today.    American Slavery didn't discriminate between genders. And for women, it was the same for blacks and whites. Also, pinning slavery and the confederacy together? I thought you knew more about the topic. But that's another debate. I should have known using the confederacy as an example would resonate with you. Like you said, it's another topic, but I could also talk about the Pacific slave trade. 
reply 17 minutes
Ghostling
Ghostling posted in Food:
Vegetables=Potatoes. Potatoes=Chips (crisps). Chips=Good.
reply about 2 hours

play online games

Candy-100

A great online version of the famous Candy Crush. This is the best game launched...

1515_gl_kidzworld_100x100_jpg_fz

Intriguing planets, weird and wonderful characters; challenge friends and find a...

157262_(2)

When you go back to Candyland, you’ll wonder why you ever left in the first plac...

100x100_ra_logo_girl

Uncle George has left you his farm, but unfortunately it’s in pretty bad shape. ...

_thumb_100x100

Shoot blobs with different properies to merge yellow blobs. Your blobs can be re...