-
x

Meet New Friends!

Recommended friends are based on your interests. Make sure they are up to date.

Friends
Kidzworld Logo

Rudolph is a Girl Reindeer?

Rudolph is a Girl Reindeer? - Reviewed by Kidzworld on Dec 27, 2006
( Rating: 1 Star Rating)

Did Santa know what he was doing when he gave all his reindeer guy names? He's a pretty smart guy but all his reindeer are females. Don't let Rudolph's name fool you. Or am I fooling you?

Do you think Santa knew Rudolph was a female reindeer when he named her? I mean, Santa's a pretty smart guy. He can visit millions of houses in one night, he doesn't get lost along the way and he even knows how to get back up a chimney. So when he gave his reindeer guy names did he know they are all girls?

There's a simple explanation for it. You see, both male and female reindeers grow antlers, unlike any of the other deer families. Male reindeer lose their antlers at the beginning of the winter, around November or the beginning of December. Females, on the other hand, keep their antlers until they give birth in the spring. There's a slight chance that one, or even two, of Santa's team are male if one (or two) of them is taking a heck of a lot longer to lose his antlers than normal. That means, there's as much a chance of Rudolph being male as there is of Britney Spears stopping by your house for Christmas dinner.

What do you think? Are Santa's reindeer males? Santa had to know what he was doing when he named them. Since they can find their way around the world without asking for directions, that's enough to convince me they're all female. Take our poll and see if others think Santa's reindeer are female.

1 Ummmmm.... maybe it's a girl or maybe not!

Kidz Submit by:

Nickname: lilncangel
Age: 11

1 No, I think Rudolph is a guy because Santa had male reindeer. So, Rudolph had to be one because Santa is a homie that is really fat like a sumo wrestler.

Kidz Submit by:

Nickname: a-lex
Age: 13

1Last week I wrote about two guys who went a little crazy wrapping the same gift every year in Pant Exchange. According to my sources, that story is true. I still might have to see the urn to believe it for myself.

Here are last week's poll results:

Which One of These Stories is Made up?

The story was soooo exaggerated: 40 percent
It really happened: 40 percent
I don't know: 20 percent

Related Stories:
157 Comments

Related Stories

Micro_santa-claus-micro
Santa Claus is headed your way soon, so find out more about this jolly man who represents all thi...
Micro_craft micro
KW knows you already have lots of Christmas cheer, but just in case you need a boost, check out t...
Micro_christmas-elf-micro
Santa Claus is one of the most high profile dudes around, especially during the month of December...
F1008783436853

Believe It or Not? Vote!

  • Santa's reindeer aren't female!
  • Now that you mention it, they are female.
  • I don't know.

Random In The Forums

Black_Rose_19
Black_Rose_19 posted in Debating:
I originally got this story from a source that most people wouldn't exactly call credible , a comedy/politics TV show, but after checking their sources, I believe I have a strong case with decently strong sources. You are incorrect when you said you'd only have to pay for labor and materials, as several other factors come into play. Also, where I said 1000 feet, I very much apologize, more like 1000 miles. It should cost about 10 billion for the concrete panels, and although concrete is cheap, it's not dirt cheap, and 1000 miles of concrete will add up to a pretty good amount. Next it should cost 5-6 billion dollars for steel columns to hold the panels, including labor.  Add another billion for concrete footing and foundations, and that's sixteen billion dollars. But, transport is required to inaccessible areas. It will cost about another 2 billion dollars to build roads that will allow 20 ton trucks to carry materials to the wall. We also need engineering, design, and management, which brings us up to the magic number of 25 billion dollars, on average considering all factors. The Congressional Budget office also says that wall management costs will exceed the original cost to build the wall in as little as seven years. With the Mexico paying for it part, as John Oliver, the host of this show, says, "People don't exactly love it when you make them pay for [expletive] they don't want." The current Mexican treasury secretary states, "Mexico, under no circumstance, is going to pay for the wall that Mr. Trump is proposing." 2 former Mexican presidents that only recently left office also say, in a nutshell, that Mexico will never pay for the wall. 
reply 9 minutes
Black_Rose_19
Black_Rose_19 posted in Debating:
I'll have to dig into that a little more, I only had about 2 sources to go off of, one of them being a private party. I am aware that scientific or economic articles aren't always correct, so I'll have to fact check this myself before I can properly reply to you.
reply 39 minutes
AlphaT
AlphaT posted in Debating:
I'd say it's a good idea, but I don't think the economist is correct. Firstly, even if he were correct, the price of the wall only comes to about half the annual trade deficit that we have with Mexico. If Mexico is making 58 billion off of us every year, then they have 25 billion to spare to pay for the wall.  But more to the point, I don't think it'll cost that much. What you'll need is money to pay for two things:  1. Materials 2. Labor You need 1.5 billion pounds worth of pre-made concrete slabs installed to create the entire wall. Concrete is ridiculously cheap, and you'd only be out three billion on concrete. Then you need steel connections between each slab, so let's add another five billion for that. Let's also add a billion dollar safe fund, in case some parts of the wall need a little something extra.  That leaves you with eleven billion dollars worth of labor before you get anywhere near the price that this economist came up with. Which is why I think he's very mistaken. 
reply about 1 hour
Black_Rose_19
Black_Rose_19 posted in Debating:
Before we start this, I have two requests. 1. Be civil to each other, rebuttal other people's statements with facts, not just random insults. I have seen debates where people are just mindlessly bullying each other, and I would hate for this to turn up like that. 2. Don't go against Donald Trump on this topic just because you think he's a racist or something. Focus on the topic at hand, please. So, we've all heard about the infamous wall. However, I have one reason that the wall might not be such a wonderful idea. Donald Trump has said that the wall will be at mimimum 35 feet tall, and again, at minimum,  1000 feet long.  Now, an economist estimated that this will cost 25 billion dollars, including costs to transport supplies, the materials, and labor, along with several other costs. This exceeds what Donald Trump says the wall would cost by 13 to 21 billion dollars. Do you still think the wall is a good idea, and remember the two requests, or no, I'd rather call them rules, I listed about a paragraph ago. 
reply about 1 hour
AlphaT
AlphaT posted in Debating:
"donteatcarrots" wrote: in the end though, a gun shoots someone. and they could die from it. usa need better laws though smh A knife stabs someone. An arrow shoots through someone. A piece of rope strangles someone. A large bite of steak chokes someone. A grocery bag suffocates someone. Just because someone can die from something, is that a reason to restrict it? 
reply about 2 hours