Kw-logo-smaller

Comments

Andi Unexpected: Book Review

Andi Unexpected by Amanda Flower is the first book in a new middle-grade mystery series following 12-year-old Andi Boggs as she solves a family tree mystery. Back to Article

Please login or register to add comments

brunostar
brunostar wrote:
2014-08-26 15:33:42 -0700

seems fun

report
unet101
unet101 wrote:
2013-12-04 06:55:59 -0800

Cool

report
illeanaz
illeanaz wrote:
2013-11-21 18:38:40 -0800

looks good.
when will it be released

report
ChickenGoPowPow
ChickenGoPowPow wrote:
2013-11-21 18:36:43 -0800

Cool. Big Grin

report
Tatiana111
Tatiana111 wrote:
2013-11-11 12:21:04 -0800

smile Awesome! Seems cool!

report
JennyD
JennyD wrote:
2013-10-28 17:04:39 -0700

I uv mysteries. this book sounds interesting

report
back to story
F1106946462703

How Often Do You Read Books?

  • Every day - I'm a massive bookworm.
  • At least once a week.
  • Only when my TV's broken and the Internet isn't working.
  • Hardly ever - unless it's for school.

related stories

Micro_backpack_micro
Get a head start on your back to school backpack shopping with these helpful tips!
Micro_bookreview-timmyfailure-micro
In the style of Diary of a Wimpy Kid, Timmy Failure: Mistakes Were Made by Stephan Pastis follows...
Micro_bookreview-graverobbersapprentice-micro
A finalist for the GG's, The Grave Robber's Apprentice is a story of friendship, determination an...
Micro_bookreview-lemoncello-micro
Mr. Lemoncello, an eccentric game maker, invites 12 students to the new library's grand-opening l...

Random in the forums

Teh_Skittlez
Teh_Skittlez posted in Debating:
"AlphaT" wrote: "Teh_Skittlez" wrote: "AlphaT" wrote: "Teh_Skittlez" wrote: "Vampire Poison" wrote: I'm not exactly sure about this one, I do feel like we should have the death penalty, and then again, I think it's cruel. I believe that it depends on the kind of person and what their crime is. I would feel a lot safer if a person who was a serial killer wasn't around anymore. Again, the Anders Breivik case is a great example of a country treating a mass murderer like a human being rather than a monster (after all, we are a little bit old to be believing in monsters).  So...after reading up on him, I'm very surprised.  He was the Taliban's Taliban.  But he's twisted. He should not of been deemed sane. He should be spending the rest of his days in Solitary Confinement.  Would locking this man in a small space and letting his mind corrode even further really service anyone? Would you or I actually be better off? Do you think the victims' families will be safer at night knowing we've crushed the psyche of a murderer?  Being in prison is good enough, and he'll stay in prison as long as he's a threat, I see no reason that we need to torture him (and that is exactly what indefinite solitary confinement is), other than to satisfy our primal desires. This is why I consider this such a progressive decision. Treating even mass murderers like human beings who still have potential value is progress.  Crushing his psyche is more humane then killing the man. And at this point, he's not going to be much good to society.  Not every psychopathic murderer can come back to be a good citizen. Should he get a shrink? Of course. But if he's deemed "broken beyond repair" I don't see why we should let him be among others, so that he can either be martyr'd for his beliefs in jail or kill a Muslim who is in the prison, or spread his message to to others.  The compromise is that we need to have a volley of psychological tests to determine if they could be fixed (And yes, i know it's not that simple...but its better then letting EVERY SINGLE PSYCHOPATH in a regular prison) and use those tests to place them either in a regular prison, or have a makeshift Arkham Asylum, or solitary confinement.  I think you're confusing high-security and solitary confinement. There is absolutely no reason to keep anybody in solitary confinement indefinitely. We do not need to kill him, or crush his psyche, we have other options. IF he is still deemed unsafe, they can deal with him as they see fit. Obviously if he presents an active danger to other inmates, he should be kept away, but I seriously question the idea that we should preemptively punish him for things he hasn't actually done yet. I don't disagree that it's a case-by-case basis, obviously not every murderer can be reintegrated into society, but if there's even one, don't you think we should give him that opportunity? I think we should start by assuming that every one can be rehabilitated (which obviously won't happen), and then narrow it down from there, not the other way around. Prison is not about making people uncomfortable, it should be about keeping society safe, and about reintegrating violent criminals into a safe society. 
reply 21 minutes
Fenmore
Fenmore posted in Say Anything:
potato
reply 22 minutes
WizardMorgan
COOKIES  :)
reply 30 minutes
AlphaT
AlphaT posted in Say Anything:
Store bought posters, be swaggin in dat room yo.
reply 36 minutes
Macbarbie09
Macbarbie09 posted in General:
Welcome to my August faves! Here are some of my Fave things in August: Song: Dancing Queen- ABBA!! That song is so Awesome!! Rude- Magic!!!  Why you gotta be so rude? Don't you know im Human too? Food: Ice Cream! Game: Pokemon X!! Show: How i met your mother what are some of your faves from August??
reply 43 minutes