×
Back left 2f43f253cf82f12a36d1f519b3672143798f55731787ab30a5ff23d1b75b4811
Back right eb032ac36c88e9da99b231a2366bd9dc4a2dc908b7b826bd3fb939bd94a1baa3
Posted about 5 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Member since:
November 2012
Posts: 440

When serving the greater good, is it ethical to commit normally unethical acts? For example, would the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which served to end WW2, be considered ethical, despite the killing of many civilians? 

The bigger question, I think, is it unethical to avoid the killing of those innocents and (pretty much invariably) cause MORE damage than if they had been bombed?

It's tricky, and for the love of god, please don't respond with "lol its unethical bye."

I am a furry little kitty. =^.^=


Posted almost 5 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Member since:
February 2012
Posts: 99

It is ethical. If doing something does more good in the long run, then it is always more ethical to do that in favor of doing something for immediate results but with possibly grievous consequences. 

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."

― Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe


Posted almost 5 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Member since:
February 2007
Posts: 30521

I dunno and this is the difficult moral question.

Im gonna use the World War 2 as the example and the Nazis killing non Arians in the concentration camps

Was it right for Germany to get attacked and for innocent Germans to get killed?
or 
Should the Nazis just have been able to kill the non Arians with out any other countries getting involved?

I dont think theres the easy answer to it but I does think that the Nazis had to get stopped and if other countries armies couldnt do it peacefully then they had to go and attack

Im not sure if this answers but I dont really think either is eithical but something had to be done  


___________________________
hugebear from gracie and mia
classicalmusicisepicdonethis for me siggy :love thank you

from classicalmusicisepic for mesiggy


hugebearkeep calm and hug ted


Posted almost 5 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Member since:
January 2012
Posts: 230

lol its unethical bye.

The foul realism is unleashed
Upon the Earth we'll bleed

The kindness of deaths grasp
Relieves us from the pain


Posted almost 5 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Member since:
January 2013
Posts: 135

This is limiting to two options only. And should it? would WW2 only end by bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
It's unethical. Why? because I believe that it's unethical to bomb people, innocent ones, to solve a political problem. So, a third option should have been made, and that would be the ethical thing to do. I think. 

My opinions is right has the possibility of being wrong, and your opinion is wrong has the possibility of being right.


Posted almost 5 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Member since:
March 2011
Posts: 11131

"-lka" wrote:

This is limiting to two options only. And should it? would WW2 only end by bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

It's unethical. Why? because I believe that it's unethical to bomb people, innocent ones, to solve a political problem. So, a third option should have been made, and that would be the ethical thing to do. I think. 



Well, all is fair in love and war. 


Posted almost 5 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Member since:
January 2013
Posts: 135

"AlphaT" wrote:



"-lka" wrote:


This is limiting to two options only. And should it? would WW2 only end by bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki.


It's unethical. Why? because I believe that it's unethical to bomb people, innocent ones, to solve a political problem. So, a third option should have been made, and that would be the ethical thing to do. I think. 



Well, all is fair in love and war. 

Says who? 

My opinions is right has the possibility of being wrong, and your opinion is wrong has the possibility of being right.


Posted almost 5 years ago

Posted By:

Thumb
Lock e1691472cafece64304be81c5c9c507a93800d3a6cd5948297266277351b71ef
Member since:
March 2011
Posts: 11131

"-lka" wrote:



"AlphaT" wrote:






"-lka" wrote:




This is limiting to two options only. And should it? would WW2 only end by bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki.



It's unethical. Why? because I believe that it's unethical to bomb people, innocent ones, to solve a political problem. So, a third option should have been made, and that would be the ethical thing to do. I think. 



Well, all is fair in love and war. 

Says who? 



Says me  Wink 


News Feed

To view full News Feed please Login using your Username and Password or Register with Kidzworld!

Forum Activity

- 2017-11-23 20:13:08 -0800

- 2017-11-23 20:13:06 -0800

- 2017-11-23 17:23:57 -0800

- 2017-11-23 15:47:24 -0800

- 2017-11-23 13:25:16 -0800

- 2017-11-23 13:21:36 -0800

- 2017-11-23 13:11:44 -0800

- 2017-11-23 13:06:17 -0800

- 2017-11-23 12:59:19 -0800

- 2017-11-23 07:39:38 -0800

- 2017-11-21 15:32:13 -0800

- 2017-11-21 10:27:45 -0800

- 2017-11-23 11:30:06 -0800

- 2017-11-21 12:54:38 -0800

- 2017-11-21 06:11:24 -0800

- 2017-11-22 09:01:35 -0800

- 2017-11-22 13:38:13 -0800

- 2017-11-21 11:00:16 -0800

- 2017-11-22 08:50:53 -0800

- 2017-11-22 23:20:34 -0800

- 2017-11-14 20:19:10 -0800

- 2017-11-14 20:07:45 -0800

- 2017-11-08 14:18:57 -0800

- 2017-11-08 14:02:06 -0800

- 2017-11-08 13:59:48 -0800

- 2017-11-08 13:58:29 -0800

- 2017-11-07 12:44:05 -0800

- 2017-11-06 10:45:03 -0800

- 2017-11-06 10:19:35 -0800

- 2017-11-03 20:26:41 -0700

- 2017-11-23 17:23:57 -0800

- 2017-11-23 07:30:45 -0800

- 2017-11-23 06:18:54 -0800

- 2017-11-22 23:20:36 -0800

- 2017-11-22 23:20:35 -0800

- 2017-11-22 23:20:34 -0800

- 2017-11-22 22:07:19 -0800

- 2017-11-22 21:23:38 -0800

- 2017-11-22 17:22:55 -0800

- 2017-11-22 16:54:54 -0800