-
x

Meet New Friends!

Recommended friends are based on your interests. Make sure they are up to date.

Friends
Kidzworld Logo

Animal Cruelty or Population Control?

Due to the controversy over the annual Canadian Seal Hunt, Kidzworld is looking at why this hunt takes place and what other animals around the world are killed in the name of population control?

Population Control: Harp Seals

The Canadian Seal Hunt happens every year for approximately two months, from late March until the first or second week of April. During this time, around 300,000 harp seals are killed. Some supporters say that the seal hunt is to control the seal population, which they say is “healthy and abundant” at about 5.6 million animals.. Back in the '70s, the harp seal population dropped dramatically so the government stopped the hunt. However, it was re-introduced in the 1990s when the seal population grew again.


The pups killed are usually less than three months old and have just started to molt (which is when they shed their white baby fur and grow their adult coats). The seals are either shot or hit repeatedly on the head with a club called a hakapik – which the Department of Fisheries and Oceans in Canada says veterinarians have found to be humane – until they die. Once killed, the pups are skinned and their furs are sold to other countries. There are reports that seals are sometimes skinned alive, but the Department of Fisheries and Oceansregulates hunting practices and says skinning seals alive is not tolerated. Another misconception is that newborn seals, or whitecoats, are killed in the hunt, but the Canadian government banned the killing of whitecoats in 1987.


Population Control: Deer

In the United States, deer are a top choice for hunters. But regulations only allow a limited number of deer to be hunted. Some people say killing these animals helps control the deer population, which is quite high in some regions. According to these people, car accidents caused by deer where their population is high can cause deaths among both deer and humans. And where high populations of deer exist, farmers can suffer when the animals eat their crops.


Population Control: Gray Wolf

The Gray Wolf was historically hunted by farmers who wanted to protect their livestock. In the early 1900s, before hunting regulations existed, the Gray Wolf was almost entirely wiped out of North America by humans. It was often killed for its fur, but mainly the animal was killed due to humans' fear of it. The Gray Wolf is listed on the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service’s Endangered Species List, but there have been moves in some states to take it off. There have been no known human deaths in North America linked to Gray Wolves. In fact, some people say that wolves are generally not dangerous to humans as long as they’re in low numbers, have enough food to eat, have little contact with humans and are occasionally hunted.

For more information on hunting and population control, click here.


Related Stories
74 Comments

Related Stories

Animal rights groups are expected to protest at the start of this year's seal cull in Canada.
Micro_orangutan-micro
We know that all-too-many animals are on the endangered species list – meaning there are very few...
Micro_pets_micro
Is hunting to control the population of animals OK or is it just animal cruelty? Here are some an...
F1149617007531

Have You Ever Worn Fur?

  • Yeah, I wear it all the time.
  • No way! That is so horrible.
  • I've worn it once or twice but I won't ever again.
  • I haven't but I would if I could afford it.

Random In The Forums

rainbowpoptart
rainbowpoptart posted in General:
This is probably the cutest thing about growing up I've ever read, I just... Everyone grows up. No one's the exact same person they were 3 years ago, sometimes they're not even the same way they were 3 days ago. Every single is person is going to look back at their past self and cringe at something- something they said, something they did, something they didn't do. It's a sign of maturity. Everyone gets there (eventually; some earlier than others). I came back from a break around two or three months ago and wow did I feel embarrassed. I was in such an extreme scene phase when I made this account and everything was so.. yikes. My bio and albums were scattered with pictures of band members and "emo" YouTubers and I wanted to, like, burn it all (I deleted a lot of them, but the less cringey ones are still there). And my username..? Oh man my username. Not gonna be able to live this one down, that's for sure. I'm going to stay until I'm 18, if I find the time to (which I should because cyber school isn't that time consuming so). Maybe the remnants of 12 year old Kristin are the bane of my existence, but I've made some nice memories here, and I'm looking forward to making many more. (:
reply 14 minutes
AlphaT
AlphaT posted in Debating:
@Boysrock50  Do you mind if my response is lengthy?
reply 19 minutes
Boysrock50
Boysrock50 posted in Debating:
"AlphaT" wrote:   1. He's building a wall to keep illegal immigrants out. Illegal immigrants are people who come into the United States without following our immigration laws. In other words, he's building a wall so that people will stop breaking the law.  2. He's hired many Muslims and has many Muslim friends. His ban on Muslims has recently changed, but even in its' original state, it was a temporary ban meant to combat radical Islam. Trump's Muslim policies have never had anything to do with thinking that all Muslims are bad, it's just that most terrorists are Muslim and a temporary Muslim ban would eliminate most of the terrorists coming into our country.  3. Business deals with politics, and perhaps we need someone who's not a politician? Many have become corrupt, have been found to blatantly lie to their people, have not kept their promises after being elected. If anything, the fact that Trump is successful and yet not a politician is even more of a reason to vote for him.  Honestly, I thought the whole "Trump hates Mexicans and Muslims" thing would have been over by now. It's so obvious that he doesn't hate them, all you have to do is listen to what he says.    1) Just a few issues with the wall, disregarding the purpose. Is the wall going to replace current fencing? There may be major breaches whilst the wall is under construction. Will Trump have permission to build on every inch of land the wall is to be placed upon? How do you expect Mexico to pay for it when they outright refused? The geography alone will not make it easy to build completely along the border. Do you not think the alienating Mexico will create a larger social divide between the two countries? Finally, the engineering alone behind the wall is so implausible, I don't think Trump himself realises just how difficult it will be. 2) "He has many Muslim friends" - Oh dear, the classic anti-racist comment. 'I'm not racist because I'm friends with blacks'. His current proposal is just as absurd as his original proposal. He wants to ban Muslims coming from countries with a terrorist past? (or has he changed his proposal yet again?). Let's see, that consists of almost every country in the world if you want to go back far enough. How far in the past does he want to look? He also mentioned that he wants to suspend immigration of the same people trying to enter countries with US alliance. What, does he plan on flying over and stopping Iraqis from entering the UK? That should be entertaining. This ban though... yes, you're preventing 'Muslim terrorists' from entering the US but you're also preventing 1.5 billion other Muslims from entering. That totally seems fair. Why don't you ban holiday makers from entering the US too, because 1 decided to commit murder in the past? You'll probably get a similar attacker-innocent ratio. 3) Can we stop with the whole idea that being able to run a business means you can run a country? If that were true the UK would have had Sir Alan Sugar in power years ago. He's not even an economist. He probably doesn't even know what a Current Account is. The government isn't a business. The US has a free market economy, not a command economy. Trump isn't going to be a salesman, he's going to be a Prime Minister. It's vital he knows his politics. He may have ideas that people love but he has no idea how to run a country. P.s. I really worry for America's future economy if their idea of a 'successful' businessman is someone who ends up piling on so much debt that his businesses reach bankruptcy. There are countless businessmen more successful than Trump that 90% of people haven't ever heard of. Trump loves to big himself up and so do his supporters. You're making the man sound far greater than he actually is and it's possibly going to cost you the future of your country.
reply about 1 hour
AlphaT
AlphaT posted in Debating:
"KingShawn13" wrote:And now I ask how much of this was the fault of the Presidents before him and how much was actually his fault? It was entirely his fault, or the fault of his administration. The only thing you could blame Bush for is the war in Iraq, but even though Obama didn't start the war in Iraq, he ended it in the worst way possible. 
reply about 1 hour
trinityac
trinityac posted in General:
Don't worry I felt the same way when getting back on this account. I had made it when I was about to turn 11. I am 15 now. Time changes a lot and I am definitely not the same person I was when starting kidzworld. I'm starting my Sophomore year after summer is over and honestly I'll probably try to stick to this website for as long as I can until they lock my account when I'm 18.  
reply about 2 hours