Kw-logo-smaller

Art or Just Plain Crap?

Art or Just Plain Crap? - Reviewed by Kidzworld on Dec 27, 2006
( Rating: 1 Star Rating)

Art challenges us to search our souls and minds by creating welcome (and not so welcome,) debate among our peers. But should we ever draw the line on offensive art? Kidzworld is letting you decide!

The great thing about artwork is that a million different people can interpret it in a million different ways. Art challenges us to search our souls and minds by creating welcome (and not so welcome,) debate among our peers. But are some artists out for shock value more than anything else? And if they are, is this an abuse of the artistic community? When should we, if ever, draw the line on offensive art? Kidzworld is going to let you decide!

Back in 1999, a controversial art exhibit called "Sensation" arrived at the Brooklyn Museum of Arts. It didn't take long for the show to receive tons of criticism from both the public and the mayor of New York, Rudolph Giuliani. Many, including the mayor, were outraged at pieces that used elephant feces and dead farm animals to portray the artists' disgust for the Christian religion.

Holy Virgin Mary drew the most attention from onlookers. The painting is a depiction of the Virgin Mary as a black woman and is splattered with elephant dung. Mayor Giuliani called the art exhibit "anti-Catholic," and because the Brooklyn Museum of Art receives funding each year from the city of New York, the mayor took the museum to court to decide if the city should have to continue with such financial support.

In the end, the Brooklyn Museum of Art won and the city does still contribute to the museum's operating fund. that Mayor Giuliani and the citizens of New York had a legitimate case?

At the same time as the Holy Virgin Mary protests, a group of people thought it would be fun to create a painting called Jesus Rising #4, which eventually drew more attention than the cast of Friends showing up at your birthday party. Stories of peeps protesting because Jesus Rising #4 wasn't "anti-christian" enough, soon made their way around the 'net. Non-Christians, offended by the Christian religion, were said to have marched in front of New York's Whitney Museum with signs that read, "Where's the Feces?" and "Blasphemy Now!" Some suggested that the painting be smeared with blood, while others were happy to see any bodily fluid incorporated into the work of art in protest of the Christian religion itself. The painting ended up staying just the way painter Miguel Nunez had intended it to be - feces free. Soon this hoax was uncovered and it turned out that Jesus Rising #4 never existed, nor did Miguel Nunez, but it did create some pretty interesting debate about art!

Controversial paintings from New York City art galleries.
Holy Virgin Mary and Jesus Rising #4

1 Jesus Christ is beautiful and not crap. For you to say that to me is offensive to my religion. How would you like it if I said your religion's artwork was just plain "CRAP?" So, it's not crap. It's lovley. But although Jesus is lovley, I think the picture of Mary is offensive.

Kidz Submit by:

Nickname: sheena rules the world
Age: 14

What do you think about these works of art, the controversy that surrounds them and art censorship? Should there be limits on what is legitimate art, or should we let everything fall under the heading of "Freedom of Artistic Expression?" Should religious beliefs be taken into account when dealing with art censorship? to Kidzworld and we'll post 'em up!

Related Stories:

  • Andy Warhol Biography - Pop Art
  • Art Inspired By September 11th
  • Temper the Graffiti Artist
  • >
    >

    readers voted!

    Comments

    ps3master

    ps3master wrote:

    The fact that kidzworld would even think those paintings have any "good" aspects shows ...
    commented: Sun Jul 07, 2013

    JBiebs_Joker

    JBiebs_Joker wrote:

    true, jesus is more beautiful than the pic right next to him which looks like crap, duh
    commented: Mon May 23, 2011

    there are 2 more comments

    Please login or register to add comments

    share with your friends


    Twitter Facebook Myspace Digg


    like this article?
    Sign up now to get more just like!

    latest videos

    F1034899914625

    Amount of $ Brooklyn Museum gets from NYC?

    • A hundred thousand dollars each year.
    • Three million dollars goes to the museum.
    • Half a million dollars each year.
    • The museum gets eight million dollars a year.

    related stories

    Random in the forums

    Teh_Skittlez
    Teh_Skittlez posted in Debating:
    "AlphaT" wrote: "Teh_Skittlez" wrote: "AlphaT" wrote: "Teh_Skittlez" wrote: "Vampire Poison" wrote: I'm not exactly sure about this one, I do feel like we should have the death penalty, and then again, I think it's cruel. I believe that it depends on the kind of person and what their crime is. I would feel a lot safer if a person who was a serial killer wasn't around anymore. Again, the Anders Breivik case is a great example of a country treating a mass murderer like a human being rather than a monster (after all, we are a little bit old to be believing in monsters).  So...after reading up on him, I'm very surprised.  He was the Taliban's Taliban.  But he's twisted. He should not of been deemed sane. He should be spending the rest of his days in Solitary Confinement.  Would locking this man in a small space and letting his mind corrode even further really service anyone? Would you or I actually be better off? Do you think the victims' families will be safer at night knowing we've crushed the psyche of a murderer?  Being in prison is good enough, and he'll stay in prison as long as he's a threat, I see no reason that we need to torture him (and that is exactly what indefinite solitary confinement is), other than to satisfy our primal desires. This is why I consider this such a progressive decision. Treating even mass murderers like human beings who still have potential value is progress.  Crushing his psyche is more humane then killing the man. And at this point, he's not going to be much good to society.  Not every psychopathic murderer can come back to be a good citizen. Should he get a shrink? Of course. But if he's deemed "broken beyond repair" I don't see why we should let him be among others, so that he can either be martyr'd for his beliefs in jail or kill a Muslim who is in the prison, or spread his message to to others.  The compromise is that we need to have a volley of psychological tests to determine if they could be fixed (And yes, i know it's not that simple...but its better then letting EVERY SINGLE PSYCHOPATH in a regular prison) and use those tests to place them either in a regular prison, or have a makeshift Arkham Asylum, or solitary confinement.  I think you're confusing high-security and solitary confinement. There is absolutely no reason to keep anybody in solitary confinement indefinitely. We do not need to kill him, or crush his psyche, we have other options. IF he is still deemed unsafe, they can deal with him as they see fit. Obviously if he presents an active danger to other inmates, he should be kept away, but I seriously question the idea that we should preemptively punish him for things he hasn't actually done yet. I don't disagree that it's a case-by-case basis, obviously not every murderer can be reintegrated into society, but if there's even one, don't you think we should give him that opportunity? I think we should start by assuming that every one can be rehabilitated (which obviously won't happen), and then narrow it down from there, not the other way around. Prison is not about making people uncomfortable, it should be about keeping society safe, and about reintegrating violent criminals into a safe society. 
    reply 21 minutes
    Fenmore
    Fenmore posted in Say Anything:
    potato
    reply 22 minutes
    WizardMorgan
    COOKIES  :)
    reply 30 minutes
    AlphaT
    AlphaT posted in Say Anything:
    Store bought posters, be swaggin in dat room yo.
    reply 36 minutes
    Macbarbie09
    Macbarbie09 posted in General:
    Welcome to my August faves! Here are some of my Fave things in August: Song: Dancing Queen- ABBA!! That song is so Awesome!! Rude- Magic!!!  Why you gotta be so rude? Don't you know im Human too? Food: Ice Cream! Game: Pokemon X!! Show: How i met your mother what are some of your faves from August??
    reply 43 minutes

    play online games

    Candy-100

    A great online version of the famous Candy Crush. This is the best game launched...

    1515_gl_kidzworld_100x100_jpg_fz

    Intriguing planets, weird and wonderful characters; challenge friends and find a...

    157262_(2)

    When you go back to Candyland, you’ll wonder why you ever left in the first plac...

    100x100_ra_logo_girl

    Uncle George has left you his farm, but unfortunately it’s in pretty bad shape. ...

    _thumb_100x100

    Shoot blobs with different properies to merge yellow blobs. Your blobs can be re...